Review

The article researches the problematic issues of attracting a specialist at the initial stage of the investigation of robbery committed with the penetration into the house. The tactical and organizational issues that arise in the investigator during the involvement of a specialist during the investigation are considered.

The author analyzes the theory and practice of attracting a specialist for carrying out separate investigatory actions at the initial stage of investigation of robbery. The article formulates scientificpractical recommendations on the use of special knowledge in the process of investigation.

At the initial stage of the investigation of robbery, in most cases there is a need to attract specialists from different profiles, both legal and non-legal, who have special knowledge on particular issues that arise during the investigation. Such specialists, as a rule, are criminologists, cynologists with an official dog, biologists, chemists, forensic physicians, psychologists and others.

It should be noted that the current legislation also lacks a clear definition of the concept of special knowledge. In some normative documents, the concept of special knowledge is used in the regulation of the conditions for carrying out certain types of expert research, where there is a need for the application of narrow professional knowledge. As a result, there is a debate about the definition of this concept in scientific circles.

Effective investigation of robbery committed with housing penetration is impossible without the participation of specialists. Taking into account the specifics of robbery with penetration into the home, it should be noted that at the initial stage of the investigation of this crime there is a need for attracting specialists from different profiles, namely, forensic, ballistic, chemical, biological, forensic, medical and others.

References

1. 1. Kryminalnyi protsesualnyi kodeks Ukrainy [Criminal Procedural Code of Ukraine]: Zakon Ukrainy vid 13.04.2012 № 4651-VI. База даних Законодавство України / ВР України дата зверення 04.02.2018 (in Ukrainian).
2. Averianova T, Belkyn R, Korukhov Yu, Rossynskaia E, Krymynalystyka [Criminalistics] (Norma 2007) 944 (in Russian).
3. Shepitko V, Zhuravel V, Avdieieva H, Innovatsiini zasady tekhniko-kryminalistychnoho zabezpechennia diialnosti orhaniv kryminalnoi yustytsii [Innovative principles of technical and forensic provision of the activities of criminal justice bodies] (Apostil 2017) 238 (in Ukrainian).
4. Komakha V, ’Do pytannia vidnosno problemy stvorennia informatsiinoi bazy danykh z metoiu identyfikatsii retsydyvistiv za oznakamy DNK’ [On the issue of creating an information database to identify recidivists based on DNA] (2003) Informatsiine zabezpechennia protydii orhanizovanii zlochynnosti 142–150 (in Ukrainian).
5. 1 В Комаха, До питання відносно проблеми створення інформаційної бази даних з метою ідентифікації рецидивістів за ознаками ДНК (ФЕНИКС 2003) 46.
6. 2 Т Заграй, ’Проблеми використання даних ДНК-аналізу при розслідуванні злочинів’ Сучасні криміналістичні експертизи в розслідуванні злочинів’: матеріали круглого столу (НАВС 2015) 30.
7. Shcherbakovskyi M H, ’Konsultatsiina funktsiia spetsialista u kryminalnomu provadzhenni’ [Advisory function of a specialist in criminal proceedings] (2017) 62 Kryminalistyka i sudova ekspertyza 43 (in Ukrainian).
8. Yusupov V V, ’Spetsialni i kryminalistychni znannia u kryminalnomu provadzhenni: pytannia spivvidnoshennia’ [Special and Forensic Knowledge in Criminal Proceedings: Relationship Issues] (2014) 59 Krymynalystyka y sudebnaia ekspertyza 47–55 (in Ukrainian).
9. Pohoretskyi M A, ’Piat rokiv chynnosti Kryminalnoho protsesualnoho kodeksu Ukrainy: problemni pytannia [Five years of the Criminal procedural code of Ukraine: problematic issues] (2017) 3 Visnyk kryminalnoho sudochynstva 11–27 (in Ukrainian).
10. Starenkyi O S, ’Zakonodavchi novovvedennia shchodo protsesualnoho poriadku provadzhennia okremykh slidchykh (rozshukovykh) dii yak zasobiv otrymannia dokaziv u dosudovomu rozsliduvanni’ [Legislative innovations concerning the procedure for the conduct of separate investigative (search) actions as means of obtaining evidence in a pre-trial investigation] (2017) 4 Visnyk kryminalnoho sudochynstva 82–93 (in Ukrainian).
11. Kovalevska Ye V, ’Znachennia vykorystannia henotyposkopii yak vydu spetsialnykh medychnykh znan pid chas rozsliduvannia zlochyniv / Suchasni kryminalistychni ekspertyzy v rozsliduvanni zlochyniv’ [Significance of use of genotyposcopy as a kind of special medical knowledge during the investigation of crimes Modern forensic expertise in crime investigation] materialy kruhl. stolu (Nats. akad. vnutr. sprav 2015) (in Ukrainian).
12. Zagray T S, ’Problemi vikoristannya danih DNK-analіzu pri rozslіduvannі zlochinіv’ [Problems of DNA data analysis in crime investigation] Suchasnі krimіnalіstichnі ekspertizi v rozslіduvannі zlochinіv: materіali krugl. Stolu (Nac. akad. vnutr. sprav 2015) (in Ukrainian).