SCIENTIFIC AND PRACTICAL COMMENTARY ON ARTICLE 159–1 OF THE CRIMINAL CODE OF UKRAINE " VIOLATION OF THE PROCEDURE FOR FINANCING POLITICAL PARTIES, PRE-ELECTION CAMPAIGNING, AND CAMPAIGNING FOR ALL-UKRAINIAN OR LOCAL REFERENDUMS"
Review
Vasyl Farynnyk’s monograph offers a comprehensive theoretico-prakseological study of coercive measures in Ukrainian criminal proceedings. The author:
traces the historical and conceptual roots of procedural coercion in criminal justice;
traces the historical and conceptual roots of procedural coercion in criminal justice;
examines international norms (the ECHR, ECtHR jurisprudence) and foreign practices;
examines international norms (the ECHR, ECtHR jurisprudence) and foreign practices;
classifies the range of enforcement measures (preventive measures, procedural compulsion, pre-trial detention, etc.) and outlines general rules for their use;
classifies the range of enforcement measures (preventive measures, procedural compulsion, pre-trial detention, etc.) and outlines general rules for their use;
identifies common mistakes and legal violations in selecting and implementing these measures;
identifies common mistakes and legal violations in selecting and implementing these measures;
provides practical recommendations to improve oversight and control mechanisms for investigators, prosecutors, and examining judges.
provides practical recommendations to improve oversight and control mechanisms for investigators, prosecutors, and examining judges.
The findings can inform legislative reform, enhance law‐enforcement practice, and serve as a resource in legal education.