Review

This article contains a list and a specific destination to investigate crimes in international student exchange sphere of actions which the legislator classified as «interference in private communication». Some criminal offenses that are classified as «crimes in international student exchange sphere» are determined; the nature of the interference in private communication and each of the acts that constitute its meaning are examined; the features of using them to investigate such categories of crimes are determined.

On the basis of the practice of interference in private communication to investigate crimes in international student exchange sphere the ways of improving the legal regulation and organization of covert investigative (search) actions are determined.

Determined that the effective use of interference in private communication for the investigation of crimes in international student exchange sphere their regulatory definition should be as clear and unambiguous.

In this case, the names of covert investigative (search) actions in departmental instructions should meet the full volume name, formulated by the legislator in the Criminal Procedure Code of Ukraine: audio, video monitoring of an individual; arrest, inspection and seizure of correspondence; collecting information from transport telecommunication networks; collecting information from electronic information systems. Separation of the specific covert investigative (search) actions into subspecies should be consistent with the norms of these laws.

At the same time, the rules of the Criminal Procedure Code of Ukraine are subject to adjustment in the part names. In particular, audio, video monitoring of an individual it is advisable to distinguish between control publicly accessible and publicly inaccessible places (not place and person, as is done in the Criminal Procedure Code of Ukraine).

Keywords: interference in private communication, international student exchange, operative subdivisions, criminal activity, investigator, prosecutor.