Review

The article deals with the legislative realities of the current legal regulation of the issue of appeals against court rulings in criminal proceedings in Part 2 of Art. 392 Criminal Procedure Code of Ukraine, which clearly do not correspond to the content of the constitutional norm in Point 8 of Art. 129, that is, there is an apparent discrepancy with constitutional guarantees regarding the right to appeal the case, in particular, any court decision on any question. Analysis of the content of Art. 392 CPC of Ukraine leads to the conclusion that judgments can be appealed in an appeal only in cases provided for by the CPC of Ukraine. However, it should be noted that the content of the provisions of Part 2 of Art. 382 CPC of Ukraine fully corresponded to the previous wording of Article 129 of the Constitution of Ukraine, which has expired. Contents of Part 2 of Art. 392 CPC of Ukraine is not brought by the legislator in accordance with the requirements of the constitutional guarantees of the appeal review of the case concerning court decisions without any restrictions (Point 8 of Part 1 of Art. 129 of the Constitution of Ukraine, after the introduction of amendments by the Law No. 1401-VIII of 02.06.2016), which, in accordance with the case law, leads to a violation of the constitutional guarantees of the implementation of the basic principles of legal proceedings and, accordingly, the rights of individuals to freedom and personal integrity. Application by courts of Part 2 of Art. 392 of the CPC of Ukraine, effectively deprives the accused of the right to appeal and appeal cassation of a court of first instance decision regarding the election of a preventive measure against them.

Thus, the limitation of the right to appeal the decision to extend the preventive measure during the trial, along with the legal uncertainty of the legal norm itself provided for in Part 2 of Art. 392 CPC of Ukraine, and its arbitrary interpretation by judges, leads to: violation of the rule of law principle stipulated in Art. 8 of the Constitution of Ukraine; violation of the constitutional right to freedom and personal integrity provided for in Art. 29 of the Constitution of Ukraine; the rights to defense in court of their violated rights, stipulated by Art. 55 of the Constitution of Ukraine and the right to appeal the case regarding the measure of preventive measures provided for in Point 8 of Art. 129 of the Constitution of Ukraine.

References

1. 1. Videnska deklaratsiia pro zlochynnist i pravosuddia: vidpovidi na vyklyky XXI stolittia 2000 r. [Vienna Declaration on Crime and Justice: Answers to the Challenges of the 21st Century 2000] data zvernennia 06.06. 2018 (in Ukrainian).
2. Zahalna deklaratsiia prav liudyny [Universal Declaration of Human Rights]: Mizhnarodnyi dokument vid 10.12.1948 995_015 data zvernennia 06.06.2018 (in Ukrainian).
3. Pro sudoustrii i status suddiv [On the Judiciary and the Status of Judges]: Zakon Ukrainy vid 02.06.2016 № 1402-VIII data zvernennia 06.06.2018 (in Ukrainian).
4. Konstytutsiia Ukrainy [Constitution of Ukraine]: Zakon Ukrainy vid 28.06.1996 № 254k/96-VR
5. data zvernennia 20.01.2018 (in Ukrainian).
6. Kryminalnyi protsesualnyi kodeks Ukrainy [Criminal Procedural Code of Ukraine]: Zakon Ukrainy vid 13.04.2012 № 4651-VI data zvernennia 06.06.2018 (in Ukrainian).
7. Kryminalno-protsesualnyi kodeks Ukrainy [Criminal Procedural Code of Ukraine]: Zakon Ukrainy vid 28.12.1960 № 1001–05. data zvernennia 06.06.2018 (in Ukrainian).
8. Konstytutsiina skarha z pryvodu porushennia konstytutsiinykh prav hromadianyna Ukrainy Hlutsenka V. M. shchodo nevidpovidnosti Konstytutsii Ukrainy ch. 2 st. 392 KPK Ukrainy [Konstytutsiina skarha z pryvodu porushennia konstytutsiinykh prav hromadianyna Ukrainy Hlutsenko V. M. shchodo nevidpovidnosti Konstytutsii Ukrainy ch. 2 hours 392 KPK Ukrainy] data zvernennia 06.06.2018 (in Ukrainian).
9. Sprava «Delkur proty Belhii» (zaiava № 2689/65): rishennia Yevropeiskoho sudu z prav liudyny vid 17.01.1970 [Case «Delkour v. Belgium» (application no. 2689/65): Judgment of the European Court of Human Rights dated January 17, 1970] data zvernennia 06.06.2018 (in Ukrainian).
10. Sprava «Harsia Manibardo proty Ispanii» (zaiava № 38695/97): rishennia Yevropeiskoho sudu z prav liudyny vid 15.02.2000 [Case «García Manibardo v. Spain» (application no. 38695/97): Judgment of the European Court of Human Rights of 15.02.2000] data zvernennia 06.06.2018 (in Ukrainian).
11. Sprava «Hofman proty Nimechchyny» (zaiava № 34045/96): rishennia Yevropeiskoho sudu z prav liudyny vid 11.10.2001 [Case Hofmann v. Germany (application no. 34045/96): Judgment of the European Court of Human Rights of 11.10.2001] data zvernennia 06.06.2018 (in Ukrainian).
12. Rishennia KSU u spravi za konstytutsiinym podanniam Upovnovazhenoho Verkhovnoi Rady Ukrainy z prav liudyny shchodo vidpovidnosti Konstytutsii Ukrainy (konstytutsiinosti) polozhen ch. 2 st. 1712 Kodeksu administratyvnoho sudochynstva Ukrainy № Z-rp/2015 vid 08.04.2015 [The decision of the CCU in the case under the constitutional petition of the Commissioner of the Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine on human rights regarding the compliance of the Constitution of Ukraine (constitutionality) with the provisions of Part 2 of Art. 1712 of the Code of Administrative Proceedings of Ukraine No. З-рп / 2015 dated April 8, 2015]
13. data zvernennia 06.06. 2018 (in Ukrainian).
14. Sprava «Kuchera proti Slovachchini» (zayava # 48666/99): rIshennya Evropeyskogo sudu z prav lyudini vId 08.08.2011 [Case «Kucher v. Slovakia» (application no. 48666/99)] data zvernennya 06.06. 2018.