Review

The procedural activity of the investigator has undergone significant transformations in its content and scope, which has changed the traditional view of the procedural activity of the authorized entity since current Criminal Procedural Code of Ukraine enured. Currently, the relevant issue – is legal regulation of the activities of pre-trial investigation participants, in particular the activities of the investigator and his interaction with other unauthorized participants of the criminal process in general. Therefore, neither practice nor scientific research in criminal procedural law has not solved the problem during the period of the 1960’ Code of Criminal Procedure.

The purpose of the article – to determine features of co-relation between the activities of the investigator and the activities of unauthorized participants in pre-trial investigation which are based on systematic analysis of the criminal procedural legislation of Ukraine, scientific sources, and materials of practice.

It is noted that the procedural activity of the investigator became more controlled by unauthorized participants in the investigation and by the authorized representatives of its participants. The list of procedural actions and decisions of the investigator, which he must coordinate with the prosecutor and investigating judge, which can be appealed by the interested parties of the proceeding, is expanded.

It is concluded that the investigator can operate autonomously or in co-operation with unauthorized participants in pre-trial investigation while transforming criminal procedure legislation.

Entertain the notion of unauthorized participants exercise their rights, obligations and prohibitions only in co-relation with the investigator, as a rule. The author concludes that the investigator’s activity consists in the accumulation of the results of the proceedings of all other participants of the investigation, including those who operate departmental control, prosecutorial supervision and procedural guidance, judicial control.

References

1. 1. Ugolovno-processualnyj kodeks Rossijskoj Federacii [The Code of Criminal Procedure of the Russian Federation] ot 18 dekabrya 2001 goda: Sobranie zakonodatelstva Rossijskoj Federacii 2001 № 52. st. 4921 data obrasheniya 05.05.2018 (in Russian).
2. Baulin Yu V, Borisov V I, Dorosh L V ta inshi, Problemi zabezpechennya efektivnosti diyalnosti organiv kriminalnogo peresliduvannya v Ukrayini [Problems of ensuring the effectiveness of the criminal prosecution authorities in Ukraine] (Harkiv, Pravo 2010) 400 (in Ukranian).
3. Karabut L V, Kriminalna procesualna diyalnist [Criminal proceedings] (Lugansk, RVV Luganskogo derzh. un-tu vnutr. sprav 2014) 320 (in Ukranian).
4. Kovalenko Ye G, Kriminalnij proces Ukrayini [The criminal process of Ukraine] (Kiyiv, Yurinkom Inter 2003) 576 (in Ukranian).
5. Kolbaya G N, Sootnoshenie predvaritelnogo sledstviya i sudebnogo razbiratelstva [The ratio of preliminary investigation and trial] (Moskva, Yurid. lit. 1975) 152 (in Russian).
6. Lobojko L M, Metodi kriminalno-procesualnogo prava [Methods of criminal procedural law] (Dnipropetrovsk, Dniprop. derzh. un-t vnutr. sprav 2006) 352 (in Ukranian).
7. Loskutov T O, Predmet regulyuvannya kriminalnogo procesualnogo prava [The subject of the regulation of criminal procedural law] (Kiyiv, Istina 2016) 416 (in Ukranian).
8. Mizulina E B, Ugolovnyj process: koncepciya samoogranicheniya gosudarstva [Criminal process: the concept of self-restraint of the state] (Tartu, Tartuskij un-t 1991) 148 (in Russian).
9. Milicin S D, Predmet regulirovaniya sovetskogo ugolovno-processualnogo prava [The subject of regulation of Soviet criminal procedural law] (Sverdlovsk, Izd-vo Ural. un-ta 1991) 112 (in Russian).
10. Nazarov V V, Omelyanenko G M, Kriminalnij proces Ukrayini [The criminal process of Ukraine] Vid.2-e, dop. i pererobl (Kiyiv, Atika 2007) 547 (in Ukranian).
11. Rozin N N, Ugolovnoe sudoproizvodstvo: posobie k lekciyam [Criminal proceedings: manual kb lektsiyam] 2-e izd., izm. dopol. (SPb., Izdanie Yuridicheskago knizhnago sklada «Pravo» 1914) 547 (in Belarusian).
12. Skakun O F, Teoriya derzhavi i prava [Theory of state and law] (Harkiv, Konsum 2001) 656 (in Ukranian).
13. Strogovich M S, Kurs sovetskogo ugolovnogo processa [The course of the Soviet criminal process]
14. T. 1 (Moskva, Nauka 1968) 470 (in Russian).
15. Udalova L D, Kriminalnij proces Ukrayini [The criminal process of Ukraine] (Kiyiv, PALIVODA 2007) 352 (in Ukranian).
16. Elkind P S, Tolkovanie i primenenie norm ugolovno-processualnogo prava [Interpretation and application of the rules of criminal procedural law] (Moskva, Yurid. lit. 1967) 192 (in Russian).
17. Pohoretskyi M A, Kryminalno-protsesualni pravovidnosyny: struktura i systema: [Criminalprocedural legal relations: structure and system] (Kharkiv, Arsis LTD, 2002). 160 (in Ukranian).
18. Gemaj S O, ’Struktura dispoziciyi norm kriminalno-procesualnogo prava’ [The structure of the disposition of the rules of criminal procedural law] (2007) 37 Visnik Harkivskogo nac. un-tu vnutr. sprav 146–156 (in Ukranian).
19. Mizulina E B, ’O tehnologicheskoj teorii ugolovnogo processa’ [On the technological theory of the criminal process] / Uroki reformy ugolovnogo pravosudiya v Rossii: materialy raboty Mezhved. rabochej gruppy po monitoringu UPK RF i v svyazi s pyatiletiem so dnya ego prinyatiya i vvedeniya v dejstvie: sb. st. i mater. (Moskva, Yurist 2006) 68–87 (in Russian).