Review

More than six months ago (December 15, 2017) the «newly formed» Supreme Court began its work. In this regard, the article examines the first results of the activities of the Grand Chamber and the Judicial Chamber on Criminal Cases in the Supreme Court. Particular attention is paid to the actual legal positions of the Grand Chamber of the Supreme Court in criminal law and legal proceedings, the validity of the relevant legal positions and their significance for further court practice. The author analyzes the problem points in the activity of the «updated» Supreme Court and makes the proposals for their elimination.

The purpose of this article is to analyze the first results and achievements of the activities of the Grand Chamber and Judicial Chamber on Criminal Cases as part of the Supreme Court, the latest court practice in criminal law and legal proceedings, as well as to develop concrete proposals for improving the work of the Supreme Court.

Despite the enormous strain on the «renewed» Supreme Court, it must be recognized that the first results of his work leave moderate optimism about the systematic unification of the court practice in criminal law and criminal process. Particular attention deserves the level of structuring and argumentation of court decisions of the Grand Chamber of the Supreme Court, an example of which should serve also cassation courts in the Supreme Court when making their decisions. On the whole, we will hope that the «fervor» with which the judge of the Supreme Court began to work will not be extinguished in the near future and the Supreme Court itself will become a catalyst for qualitative changes in ensuring the rule of law in Ukraine.

The main directions of improvement of the Supreme Court’s activity should be: 1) structuring decisions of the Judicial Chamber on Criminal Cases as part of the Supreme Court according to the model of the Grand Chamber of the Supreme Court (with a clear division of the decisions on the points and sub-items, interim and final conclusions, doctrinal and practical analysis of the disputed moments); 2) interpretation at the level of explanations of the evaluative concepts in the updated procedural law (for example, the concepts of «exclusive legal problem», «ensuring the development of law», etc.) need to be substantially filled; 3) it should be more consistent to use the practice of the European Court of Human Rights (with an analysis of not only the legal position of the European Court of Human Rights in a particular case, but also the generalization of the factual circumstances of the case in order to determine the relevance of the case which is the subject of the dispute in proceeding, which is under consideration in the Supreme Court).

References

1. 1. Kryminalnyi protsesualnyi kodeks Ukrainy [Criminal Procedural Code of Ukraine]: zakon Ukrainy vid 13.04.2012 № 4651-VI. data zvernennia 02.05.2018 (in Ukrainian).
2. Pro sudoustrii i status suddiv [On the judicial system and the status of judges]: zakon Ukrainy vid 02.06.2016 № 1402-VIII. data zvernennia 02.05.2018 (in Ukrainian).
3. Pro vnesennia zmin do Hospodarskoho protsesualnoho kodeksu Ukrainy, Tsyvilnoho protsesualnoho kodeksu Ukrainy, Kodeksu administratyvnoho sudochynstva Ukrainy ta inshykh zakonodavchykh aktiv [On Amendments to the Commercial Procedural Code of Ukraine, the Civil Procedural Code of Ukraine, the Code of Administrative Legal Proceedings of Ukraine and other legislative acts]: zakon Ukrainy vid 03.10.2017
4. № 2147-VIII. data zvernennia 02.05.2018 (in Ukrainian).
5. Chuprynska Ye M, Rishennia Verkhovnoho Sudu Ukrainy u kryminalnomu provadzhenni: pravovi oznaky ta znachennia (2014) [Decision of the Supreme Court of Ukraine in criminal proceedings: legal signs and meanings] (2014) 2 Naukovi zapysky Instytutu zakonodavstva Verkhovnoi Rady Ukrainy 118 (in Ukrainian).
6. Koziubra M I, Systema sudiv Ukrainy ta mistse v nii Verkhovnoho Sudu Ukrainy: stan ta perspektyvy reformuvannia [The system of courts of Ukraine and the place in it of the Supreme Court of Ukraine: the state and prospects of reforming] (2012) 11–12 Pravo Ukrainy 16–18 (in Ukrainian).
7. Shevchuk S V, Zahalnoteoretychni problemy normatyvnosti aktiv sudovoi vlady [General theoretical problems of normative acts of the judiciary] (2008) Natsionalna yurydychna akademiia Ukrainy imeni Yaroslava Mudroho 433(in Ukrainian).
8. Okrema dumka suddi KSU Shevchuka S. V. stosovno Vysnovku Konstytutsiinoho Sudu Ukrainy u spravi za zvernenniam Verkhovnoi Rady Ukrainy pro nadannia vysnovku shchodo vidpovidnosti zakonoproektu pro vnesennia zmin do Konstytutsii Ukrainy (shchodo pravosuddia) vymoham statei 157 i 158 Konstytutsii Ukrainy [Separate opinion of the judge of the KSU Shevchuk S. V. Concerning the Opinion of the Constitutional Court of Ukraine in the case on the request of the Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine to give an opinion on the compliance of the draft law on amending the Constitution of Ukraine (on justice) to the requirements of Articles 157 and 158 of the Constitution of Ukraine] data zvernennia 02.05.2018 (in Ukrainian).
9. Sprava «Sierkov proty Ukrainy» (zaiava № 39766/05): rishennia Yevropeiskoho sudu z prav liudyny vid 7.07.2011 [Decision of the European Court of Human Rights in the case of Serkov v. Ukraine] data zvernennia 02.05.2018 (in Ukrainian).
10. Sprava № 569/1111/16-k: рostanova Velykoi Palaty Verkhovnoho Sudu vid 18.04.2018 [The decree of the Grand Chamber of the Supreme Court] data zvernennia 02.05.2018
11. Sprava № 243/6674/17-k: ukhvala Velykoi Palaty Verkhovnoho Sudu vid 12.04.2018 [The decision of the Grand Chamber of the Supreme Court] data zvernennia 02.05.2018 (in Ukrainian).
12. Sprava № 180/746/16-k: postanova Kasatsiinoho kryminalnoho sudu Verkhovnoho Sudu vid 03.04.2018 [The decree of the Judicial Chamber on Criminal Cases of the Supreme Court] data zvernennia 02.05.2018 (in Ukrainian).
13. Sprava № 237/1459/17: postanova Kasatsiinoho kryminalnoho sudu Verkhovnoho Sudu vid 06.03.2018 [The decree of the Judicial Chamber on Criminal Cases of the Supreme Court] data zvernennia 02.05.2018 (in Ukrainian).
14. Sprava № 348/2177/16-k: postanova Kasatsiinoho kryminalnoho sudu Verkhovnoho Sudu vid 22.01.2018 [The decree of the Judicial Chamber on Criminal Cases of the Supreme Court] data zvernennia 02.05.2018 (in Ukrainian).
15. Sprava № 348/2177/16-k: postanova Kasatsiinoho kryminalnoho sudu Verkhovnoho Sudu vid 22.01.2018 [The decree of the Judicial Chamber on Criminal Cases of the Supreme Court] data zvernennia 02.05.2018 (in Ukrainian).
16. Sprava № 243/6674/17-k: ukhvala Kasatsiinoho kryminalnoho sudu Verkhovnoho Sudu vid 6.03.2018 [The decree of the Judicial Chamber on Criminal Cases of the Supreme Court] data zvernennia 02.05.2018 (in Ukrainian).