Анотація

The article is devoted to the comprehensive study of the legal regulation of detention by an authorized official without the approval of the investigating judge, the court on the grounds determined by the current criminal procedural legislation of Ukraine. The scientific positions of well-known domestic scientists who studied the issues of detention of a person in the criminal process of Ukraine are analyzed. The detention without the order of the investigating judge, the court is considered due to the reasons for the arrest of the suspect, the rights of the detained person, authorized entities, who have the right to detain without the approval of the investigating judge, the court, before entering into the Uniform Register of pre-trial investigations. The procedural status of the detained person is considered and the state of its procedural rights is analyzed. Detention by an authorized official can be attributed to the "exception", among the measures for ensuring criminal proceedings, which can be applied to the suspect without the approval of the investigating judge, the court. The necessity of detention is analyzed as a temporary preventive measure, which is carried out prior to entering information about a criminal offense into the Unified Register of Pre-trial Investigations into a separate procedural act, which can be carried out prior to entering information into the Unified Register of Pre-trial Investigations. It is noted that detention as a temporary preventive measure is at the same time a measure of criminal proceedings, but the detention of an authorized official must be allocated to a separate investigative (wanted) action, which has the purpose, may be related to other investigators (investigatory) actions, such as a survey, a search of a person, a search of the premises by other investigators (investigators), including those that preceded such detention. It is noted that one of the tasks of detention by an authorized official under Article 208 of the Criminal Procedure Code of Ukraine is to receive (collect) evidence: testimony, material evidence, documents for the prosecution party, which, in general, will be the basis of a public prosecution. The indefinite procedural status of the detained person is compared with the procedural status of the suspect.

Key words: the suspect's detention, the authorized official, the procedural status of the detained person, the rights of the detained person, the detention of an authorized official as an investigative (wanted) action.