Review

Annotation. In the beginning of 2019 in Haag was an extensive event – Partners forum in area of access to justice that combined members from many countries which was recognizing the particular importance of this issue for the sustainable development of society around the world. A lot of events which planned for the OON up to 2030 years testified about their actuality and priority. The target task is identifying the rule of law and access to justice as an important facture to progress for throughout.

For a long time access to justice in Ukraine is a priority direction to development of the legal system in general and in the judiciary in particular. «Access to justice» as a meaningful concept traditionally viewed by scientists through the prism of different conditions (legal, social, economic), or by examining the obstacles that exist in this field. Recently, the term «inclusive justice» has come to be used in relation to its characteristics, which needs due theoretical consideration.

The purpose of the article is researching something new for national science that need to be theoretical meaningful.

The main results of researching are in next clause: The concept « inclusive justice» characterizes the concept of accessibility of justice from the position of non-discrimination and equal opportunities for all, without excluding people in the means and means of judicial protection of their rights. This accent allows for focusing on the accessibility of justice for people who, due to certain factors (gender, age) or life circumstances (low income) or because of their health or other disabilities, face relative (behavioral) and environmental barriers.

For a simple understanding inclusiveness in area of justice envisages their accessibility for people with disabilities, focusing attention on special subject which need to realization this function. The concept of inclusive justice provided not only necessity to establishment appropriate conditions for effective realization rights for each people on judicial protection. This is the question accessibility for person with disabilities to judicial profession which is less researching in Ukraine.

Inclusion as a access to justice focused attention not on people with disabilities and also on possibilities available to the justice system, the means available, the ways it can use it’s potential, and most importantly the obstacles, barriers and difficulties that need to be overcome by offering solutions that are necessary for one and at the same time useful to all.

Inclusion in justice also emerges as a policy, a strategy to overcome barriers that impede it’s accessibility to the development and implementation of which must be involved both the state and directly involved in the justice process. It should provide for a system of measures, the key in formulating and prioritizing which is the identification of obstacles and the rational use of available resources.

References

1. Konventsiia pro prava osib z invalidnictiu [Convention for right people with disabilities] vid 13.12.2006 <https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/995_g71> data zvernennia 01.11.2019 [in Ukrainian].
2. Inkliuzyvnist budivel i sporud [Inclusivity of building and structures]: DBN V.2.2–40:2018 (Kyiv, Minreg Urainy,2018) 64 [in Ukrainian].
3. Ob utverzhdenii perechya zabolevaniy, prepyatstvuushikh naznacheniiy na dolzhnost sudiy [On approval of the List of diseases that impede the appointment of a judge]: Postanovleniie Soveta suddey RF ot 26.12.2002 № 78 <https://ppt.ru/docs/postanovlenie/sovet-sudey/n-78–56266> data zvernennia 01.11.2019 [in Ukrainian].
4. Pro sudoustrii ta status suddiv [About judicary and the state of judge]: Zakon Ukraiy vid 02.06.2016
5. № 1402-VIII <https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/ru/1402–19/ed20171215 > data zvernennia 01.11.2019 [in Ukrainian].
6. Nichogo dlya nas bez nas [Nothing for us without us] (Kyiv, Lenvit 2015)92 data zvernennia 01.11.2019 [in Ukrainian].
7. Inkliuzyvnyi sud: chomu derzhava maie dbaty pro zabezpechennia osobam z invalidnistiu efektyvnoho dostupu do pravosuddia [Inclusive court: why government should care about providing people with disabilities with effective access to justice] (2019) Sudovo-yurydychna hazeta <https://sud.ua/ru/news/publication/147887inklyuzivniy-sud-chomu-derzhava-maye-dbati-pro-zabezpechennya-osobam-z-invalidnistyu-efektivnogodostupu-do-pravosuddya > data zvernennia 01.12.2019 [in Ukrainian].
8. Ovsiannikova O, ’Dostupnist pravosuddia yak chynnyk shcho vplyvaie na formuvannia hromadskoi dumky shchodo sudovoi vlady [Access to justice as a factor influencing the formation of public opinion on the judiciary] (2018) 4 Pravo i suspilstvo 48–54 [in Ukrainian].
9. P Keuleers, ’Access to justice for all’ <https://www.undp.org/content/undp/en/home/blog/2018/ access-to-justice-for-all.html > accessed 01.11.2019 [in English].
10. Suddya bez obmezhen [Judge without restriction] Zakon i biznes <https://zib.com.ua/ua/87059vidsutnist_zoru_ne_pereshkodzhae_otrimannyu_posadi_suddi.html > [in Ukrainian].
11. Obituaries. Sir John wall 1930–2008 <http://www.braillechess.org.uk/obituaries/johnwall.html> accessed 01.11.2019 [in English].
12. Khotynska-Nor O, ’Dostupnist do pravossudia u konteksti sudovoii reformy’ [Access to justice in context of judicial reforms] Aktualni problem sudovo-pravovoii reformy: materialy kruglogo stolu (Odesa, Fenix 2019) <https://drive.google.com/file/d/1GB4gFq_C03_Q55v79qJCWSSXAKDN8AGw/view > [in Ukrainian].
13. Khotynska-Nor O, ’Medychni obmezhennia dopusku do profesii suddi do postanovky problemy’ [Medical restrictions on admission to the profession of judge: before the problem] Suchasni vyklyky ta aktualni problemy sudovoi reformy v Ukraini: materialy III Mizhnar. nauk. – prakt. Konf (Chernivtsi, Chernivetskii nauk univ 2019) 35–38 [in Ukrainian].