Review

Annotation. One of the main tasks of reforming domestic legislation is to implement proper and effective legal regulation of the activities of state authorities aimed at preventive inspection, preventing and suppressing offenses, in particular, administrative and jurisdictional activities of law enforcement officials of Ukraine. The study of this issue is particularly relevant in the modern conditions of the dynamic development of our state, which makes it necessary to improve the legal regulation of the organization and functioning of law enforcement agencies in a democratic society, as well as bring their activities in line with international standards. The purpose of this article is to determine the specifics of the use of general administrative termination measures by law enforcement agencies as a means of ensuring the effective performance of tasks to provide state security, as well as to formulate proposals for improving the relevant provisions of the current legislation. According to the results of the study, the main administrative termination measures applied by law enforcement agencies to ensure the national security include: • demand to stop illegal behavior; • issue of a formal warning on the inadmissibility of unlawful conduct; • detention not related to administrative proceedings; • administrative termination measures applied to foreigners and stateless persons (forced return of foreigners and stateless persons; ensuring the actual execution of court decisions on the forced expulsion of foreigners and stateless persons); • use of weapons, special devices and measures of physical influence. Based on the analysis of theoretical provisions, as well as materials of jurisdictional practice, the article justifies amendments to the current legislation. Further scientific research in this area requires, first of all, search for ways to improve the legal regulation of issuing an official reservation; forced expulsion of foreigners and stateless persons, as well as the grounds and conditions for the use of weapons, special devices and physical measures by law enforcement officers. Keywords: law enforcement agencies, national security, administrative termination measures, official warning. REFERENCES LIST OF LEGAL DOCUMENTS LEGISLATION

1. Kodeks Ukrainy pro administratyvni pravoporushennia [Code of Ukraine on Administrative Offenses]: Zakon Ukrainy vid 07.12.1984 № 8073-X data zvernennia 02.10.2020 (in Ukrainian).
2. Pro kontrrozviduvalnu diialnist [About counterintelligence activity] Zakon Ukrainy vid 26.12.2002 № 374-IV data zvernennia 02.10.2020 (in Ukrainian).
3. Pro pravovyi status inozemtsiv ta osib bez hromadianstva [About the legal status of foreigners and stateless persons]: Zakon Ukrainy vid 22.09.2011 № 3773-VI < http://zakon2.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/3773– 17> data zvernennia 02.10.2020 (in Ukrainian).
4. Pro Sluzhbu bezpeky Ukrainy [About the Security Service of Ukraine]: Zakon Ukrainy vid 25.03.1992 № 2229-XII data zvernennia 02.10.2020 (in Ukrainian).

CASES

1. Sprava № 757/46361/15-p: Postanova Pecherskoho raionnoho sudu mista Kyieva [Resolution of the Pechersk District Court of Kyiv] vid 19.01.2016 < http://www.reyestr.court.gov.ua> дата звернення 02.10.2020 (in Ukrainian).
2. Sprava № 33/796/286/2016: Postanova Apeliatsiinoho sudu mista Kyieva [Resolution of the Court of Appeal of Kyiv] vid 31.10.2016 < http://www.reyestr.court.gov.ua> дата звернення 02.10.2020 (in Ukrainian).

BIBLIOGRAPHY AUTHORED BOOKS

1. Averianov V ta inshi, Averianov V (red), Administratyvne pravo Ukrainy. Akademichnyi kurs: Zahalna chastyna [Administrative law of Ukraine. Academic course: General part] (Kyiv, Yurydychna dumka 2007) (in Ukrainian).
2. Bandurka O, Tyshchenko M, Administratyvnyi protses [Administrative process] (Kyiv, Litera LTD2001) (in Ukrainian).
3. Blahodarnyi A ta inshi, Skulysh Ye (red), Administratyvne pravo Ukrainy [Administrative law of Ukraine]: (Kyiv, Nauk. – vyd. tsentr NA SB Ukrainy 2012) (in Ukrainian).
4. Blahodarnyi A ta inshi, Administratyvne pravo Ukrainy: zahalna chastyna: [Administrative law of Ukraine: general part] (Kyiv, Nats. akad. SBU2016) (in Ukrainian).
5. Blahodarnyi A, Kontseptualni zasady pravovoi rehlamentatsii administratyvno-yurysdyktsiinoi diialnosti orhaniv Sluzhby bezpeky Ukrainy [Conceptual bases of legal regulation of administrative and jurisdictional activity of bodies of the Security service of Ukraine] (Kyiv, Osvita Ukrainy 2020) (in Ukrainian).
6. Kolpakov V, Administratyvno-deliktnyi pravovyi fenomen [Administrative tort law phenomenon] (Kyiv, Yurinkom Inter 2004) (in Ukrainian).
7. Kucheryna S ta inshi, Orhanizatsiino-pravovi zasady zastosuvannia i vykorystannia spivrobitnykamy Sluzhby bezpeky Ukrainy vohnepalnoi zbroi, spetsialnykh zasobiv ta zakhodiv fizychnoho vplyvu [Organizational and legal bases for the use of firearms, special devices and measures of physical influence by the Security Service of Ukraine] (Kharkiv, Pravo 2016) (in Ukrainian).
8. Kuzmenko O, Administratyvno-pravova protydiia nelehalnii mihratsii v Ukraini [Administrative and legal counteraction to illegal migration in Ukraine] (Dnipropetrovsk, Nauka i osvita 2001) (in Ukrainian).

ARTICLES

1. Eropkyn M, ’O klassifikatsii mer administrativnogo prinuzhdeniya’ [On the classification of administrative coercive measures] (1963) Sbornik nauchnyih statey Voprosyi administrativnogo prava na sovremennom etape 60–68 (in Russian).
2. Muramets O, Nemov A, ’Puti sovershenstvovaniya pravovogo regulirovaniya vyidvoreniya iz SSSR inostrantsev’ [Ways to improve the legal regulation of the expulsion of foreigners from the USSR] (1982) 11 Sbornik trudov Vsesoyuznogo nauchno-issledovatelskogo instituta MVD SSSR90–96 (in Russian)