Review

Annotation. The article states that in the XXI century the Internet and social networks are increasingly used to the detriment of national interests. Due to the total computerization and digitalization of humanity, cyberspace is becoming an environment for cybercrime. At the same time, the threat of excessive distribution of destructive content to manipulate the minds of citizens is urgent. In view of the above, the purpose of the article is to develop effective organizational and legal methods to combat this negative phenomenon. It is noted that the current legislation establishes an exclusive list of grounds for processing (and as its component – collection) of personal data. Among them, one of the key, in the context of the collection of personal data on the Internet, except in some cases, is the consent of the personal data subject. However, it was concluded that, currently, not all Internet resources or mobile applications warn about the processing of personal information. Preferably, you can find out by analyzing the appropriate settings or permissions (sometimes by default). Also, according to the privacy policy of social networks, mobile applications, access to the processing of personal data is a prerequisite for the use of services. That is, there is no alternative, and the consent itself by its legal nature is conditionally voluntary. It is alleged that the issue of processing information (personal data) about third parties is problematic. After all, in the case when a user provides access to his own page on a social network or a phone book – he automatically provides access to data about third parties without any of their personal consent. That is, in practice there is a situation in which the right to protection of this category of persons is systematically violated. The legal experience of the European Union countries in the field of ensuring the security of personal data of citizens is analyzed. The final part of the study emphasizes that the users of the Internet and social networks are representatives of public authorities, local governments, servicemen, employees of national law enforcement agencies and special services, and other secret agents. Accordingly, further scientific development requires strengthening of legal support and purposeful application of organizational measures, first of all, in the specified environment which can be used by foreign special services, in particular by the Russian Federation, in the interests. Key words: social network, Internet, destructive influence, international legal experience of personal data protection, cyberspace.   REFERENCES LIST OF LEGAL DOCUMENTS LEGISLATION

1. General Data Protection Regulation (EU GDPR). data zvernennia 06.11.2020 [in Ukrainian].
2. Pro dostup do publichnoi informatsii: Zakon Ukrainy vid 13.01.11 r. № 2939-VI [About access to public information] data zvernennia 06.11.2020 [in Ukrainian].
3. Pro informatsiiu: Zakon Ukrainy vid 02.10.92 r. № 2657-KhII [About information] data zvernennia 06.11.2020 [in Ukrainian].
4. Pro zakhyst personalnykh danykh: Zakon Ukrainy vid 01.06.10 r. [About personal data protection] data zvernennia 06.11.2020 [in Ukrainian].

ВIBLIOGRAPHY AUTHORED BOOKS

1. Hryshchuk R. Osnovy kibernetychnoi bezpeky [Fundamentals of cyber security]: monohr; za zah. red. prof. Yu.H. Danyka. Zhytomyr: ZhNAEU, 2016. 636 s. [in Ukrainian].
2. Roman F. Chernysh, Viktoriya L. Pogrebnaya, Iryna I. Montrin, Tetiana V. Koval and Olha S. Paramonova. Formation and application of communication strategies through social networks: legal and organizational aspects. International Journal of Management. Volume 11. Issue 06. June 2020. pp. 476–488. Article ID: IJM_11_06_041 data zvernennia 06.11.2020
3. Pohoretskyi M.A. Orhanizovana zlochynnist v Ukraini: tendentsii rozvytku ta zakhody protydii. Borotba z orhanizovanoiu zlochynnistiu i koruptsiieiu. Kyiv, 2007. № 16. S. 99–111. [in Ukrainian].
4. Pohoretskyi M., Shelomentsev V. Kiberzlochyny: do vyznachennia poniattia [Cybercrime: to define the concept]. Visnyk prokuratury. 2012. № 8.S. 89–96. [in Ukrainian].
5. Pohoretskyi M., Shelomentsev V. Poniattia kiberprostoru yak seredovyshcha vchynennia zlochyniv [The concept of cyberspace as an environment for committing crimes]. Informatsiina bezpeka liudyny, suspilstva, derzhavy. 2009. № 2. S. 77–81. [in Ukrainian].
6. Chernysh R.F. Pravovyi dosvid krain Yevropeiskoho Soiuzu u sferi protydii poshyrenniu feikovoi informatsii [Legal experience of the European Union in the field of combating the dissemination of fake information]. Pidpryiemnytstvo. hospodarstvo i pravo. № 10. 2019. S. 123–128 data zvernennia 06.11.2020 [in Ukrainian]
7. Chernysh R.F. Feik, yak odyn iz instrumentiv nehatyvnoho vplyvu na natsionalnu bezpeku Ukrainy v umovakh vedennia hibrydnoi viiny. [Fake, as one of the tools of negative impact on the national security of Ukraine in a hybrid war] Chasopys kyivskoho universytetu prava. № 2. 2019. S. 109–114 . data zvernennia 06.11.2020 [in Ukrainian].
8. Chernysh R.F. Mizhnarodno-pravovyi dosvid vykorystannia sotsialnykh merezh viiskovosluzhbovtsiamy zbroinykh syl ta spivrobitnykamy pravookhoronnykh orhaniv. Porivnialno-analitychne pravo – elektronne naukove fakhove vydannia yurydychnoho fakultetu DVNZ «Uzhhorodskyi natsionalnyi universytet». 2016. Vyp. 6. S. 216–218. . data zvernennia 06.11.2020 [in Ukrainian].
9. Chernysh R.F. Yurydychna vidpovidalnist za poshyrennia feikovoi informatsii [Legal responsibility for the dissemination of fake information]. Elektronne naukove fakhove vydannia «Iurydychnyi naukovyi elektronnyi zhurnal». № 1. 2020. S. 191–194. data zvernennia 06.11.2020 [in Ukrainian].

CONFERENCE PAPERS

1. Molodetska-Hrynchuk K.V. Sotsialni boty yak instrument destruktyvnoho informatsiinoho vplyvu na aktoriv sotsialnykh internet-servisiv [Social bots as a tool of destructive informational influence on the actors of social Internet services]. Sovremennыe ynnovatsyonnыe tekhnolohyy podhotovky ynzhenernыkh kadrov dlia hornoi promыshlennosty y transporta 2017: sb. nauch. tr. mezhdunar. konf., 13–14 aprelia 2017 h., 2017. S. 442–447. [in Ukrainian].

ARTICLES

1. «Dai 5!» Zvidky vzialysia teorii pro zviazok tekhnolohii 5G z koronavirusom i chomu tse FEIK [«Give 5!» Where did the theories about the connection between 5G technology and coronavirus come from and why is it FAKE?] data zvernennia 06.11.2020 [in Ukrainian].
2. Moderatory Facebook za misiats vyiavyly 50 milioniv dopysiv iz feikamy pro koronavirus. [Facebook moderators found 50 million fake posts about the coronavirus in a month] data zvernennia 06.11.2020 [in Ukrainian].
3. Ukraina seriozno vrazhena informatsiinym manipuliatsiiam RF – doslidzhennia Facebook. data zvernennia 06.11.2020 [in Ukrainian].

WEBSITES

1. DIGITAL 2020: GLOBAL OVERVIEW REPORT. Recovered from data zvernennia 06.11.2020