Review

Annotation. The transformation that humanity is currently experiencing is leading to fundamental changes in every sphere of human existence. The changes dictated by the requirements of the time, the renaissance of the ideas of humanism as the ideological basis of society, leads to reforms in the field of criminal justice, changing and introducing new into the domestic criminal procedure legislation. The legislator is constantly looking for new effective ways for the state and society to respond to criminal offenses and combat crime, with the negative consequences of the ineffectiveness of only traditional prosecution and punishment. An effective way to resolve a conflict that has arisen as a result of a crime may be to use compromise procedures in criminal proceedings, along with traditional ones. Despite the sufficient number of scientific studies of certain criminal procedural mechanisms of compromise or conciliatory nature, it should be noted the lack of scientific research on the right to compromise in the criminal process of Ukraine and its implementation, the study of its legal nature through the prism of morality and pragmatism. the right to compromise in the criminal process of Ukraine». The aim of the article is to study the influence of moral and ethical components and pragmatic approach in the compromise solution of criminal conflict between the state, the perpetrator and the victim of the legal nature of the right to compromise in the criminal process of Ukraine and the author’s definition of «right to compromise». in the criminal process of Ukraine «. The results of scientific research by the author of this issue were the conclusion that morality, in some cases, prevails over the imperative of legal liability for what is done in case of guilty remorse, evaluation and willingness to voluntarily make amends to the victim, compensating the latter. . A clear example of this is the mechanisms for exercising the right to compromise in criminal proceedings, which are enshrined in law and at the legislative level. After analyzing the moral and ethical and pragmatic components of the legal nature of the right to compromise in criminal proceedings, the author’s definition of the right to compromise in criminal proceedings in Ukraine – the right to receive values, benefits of a regenerative nature, which corresponds to the duty of the perpetrator both for the victim and for society, in order to restore the disturbed public peace, security and law and order. Key words: the right to compromise, morality, agreements, compromise, conflict. REFERENCES LIST OF LEGAL DOCUMENTS LEGISLATION

1. Konstytutsiia Ukrainy [Constitution of Ukraine] (Vidomosti Verkhovnoi Rady Ukrainy (VVR), 1996, № 30, st. 141). data zvernennia: 11.11.2020 [in Ukrainian]

BIBLIOGRAPHY AUTHORED BOOKS

1. Karnozova L.M. Ugolovnaja justicija i grazhdanskoe obshhestvo. Opyt paradigmal’nogo analiza. [Criminal Justice and Civil Society. Experience of paradigmatic analysis.] (Moskva: R. Valent, 2010) 480 [in Russian]
2. Mihajlovskaja I.B. Celi, funkcii i principy rossijskogo ugolovnogo sudoproizvodstva (ugolovnoprocessual’naja forma). [Objectives, functions and principles of Russian criminal proceedings (criminal procedure form).] (Moskva: TK Velbi; Prospekt, 2003) 144 [in Russian]
3. Petruhin I.L. Prokurorskij nadzor i sudebnaja vlast’ [Prosecutor’s supervision and the judiciary]: ucheb. posob. (Moskva: Prospekt, 2001) 88 [in Russian]

EDITED BOOKS

1. Zahalna teoriia prava: [General theory of law] pidruchnyk; za zah. red. M.I. Koziubry.(Kyiv: Vaite, 2015) 392 [in Ukrainian]

TRANSLATED BOOKS

1. Zer H. Vosstanovitel’noe pravosudie: novyj vzgljad na prestuplenie i nakazanie [Restorative justice: a new perspective on crime and punishment] / H. Zer; per. s angl.; obshh. red. L.M. Karnozovoj; komment. L.M. Karnozovoj i S.A. Pashina. (M.: MOO Centr «Sudebno-pravovaja reforma», 2002) 328 [in Russian]

JOURNAL ARTICLES

1. Kalynychenko A. Teoretychni aspekty sudovoho kompromisu v kryminalnomu sudochynstvi Ukrainy. [Theoretical aspects of judicial compromise in the criminal justice of Ukraine] (2016) 3 Pidpryiemnytstvo, hospodarstvo i pravo 147–152 [in Ukrainian]
2. Lupenko D. Uchast prokurora u kryminalnomu provadzhenni na pidstavi uhod: problemy ta perspektyvy. [Prosecutor’s participation in criminal proceedings on the basis of agreements: problems and prospects] (2012). Ch. 2. Novely Kryminalnoho protsesualnoho kodeksu Ukrainy 2012 roku: zb. statei 65–70 [in Ukrainian]
3. Mihajlov P. Sdelki o priznanii viny – ne v interesah poterpevshih. [Plea bargains are not in the best interests of the victims] (2001) 5 Rossijskaja justicija 35–37 [in Russian]
4. Sereda H. Osoblyvosti uhody pro vyznannia vynuvatosti v kryminalnomu provadzhenni. [Features of the plea agreement in criminal proceedings] (2012) 2 Visnyk nats. akademii prokuratury Ukrainy 5–9 [in Ukrainian]
5. Tertyshnyk V.M. Kompromis u kryminalnomu protsesi. [Compromise in criminal proceedings.] (2002) 11 Pidpryiemnytstvo, hospodarstvo i pravo 107–112 [in Ukrainian]
6. Shkelebei V.A. Kompromisnyi sposib vyrishennia kryminalno-pravovoho konfliktu. [A compromise way to resolve a criminal conflict] (2013) 4 Naukovyy visnyk Natsionalʹnoho universytetu derzhavnoyi podatkovoyi sluzhby Ukrayiny (ekonomika, pravo) 168–173 [in Ukrainian]

CONFERENCE PAPERS

1. Vlasova H.P. Deiaki problemni aspekty ukladennia uhody mizh prokurorom ta pidozriuvanym chy obvynuvachenym pro vyznannia vynuvatosti. [Some problematic aspects of concluding a plea agreement between a prosecutor and a suspect or accused] Pravove zhyttia suchasnoi Ukrainy: mater. Mizhnar. nauk. – prakt. konf. (16–17 trav. 2013 r.). [Legal life of modern Ukraine: mater. International. scientific-practical conf. (May 16–17, 2013)] (Odesa, 2013) [in Ukrainian]
2. Smol’kova I.V. Konflikt v ugolovnom processe: sposoby razreshenija. [Conflict in criminal proceedings: methods of resolution] Mater. 59-j ezhegodnoj nauch. konf. professorsko-prepod. sostava, doktorantov, aspir. i stud., (27 marta – 1 aprelja 2000 g.). [Mater. 59th Annual Scientific. conf. teaching staff, doctoral students, graduate students. and stud., (March 27 – April 1, 2000)] (Irkutsk, 2000) [in Russian]

DISSERTATIONS

1. Vinnyk O.M. Teoretychni aspekty pravovoho zabezpechennia realizatsii publichnykh i pryvatnykh interesiv v hospodarskykh tovarystvakh [Theoretical aspects of legal support of realization of public and private interests in business associations]: dys. … d-ra yuryd. nauk: 12.00.04. (Kyivskyi nats. un-tet im. Tarasa Shevchenka; Kyiv, 2004). 631 [in Ukrainian]