ISSN 2413-5372, Certificate of state re-registration of КВ №25381-15321 ПР dated 01.07.2023.

Search

SCIENTIFIC - PRACTICAL JOURNAL "HERALD OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE"

PROVIDING THE INVESTIGATING JUDGE OF EVIDENCE DURING GRANTING PERMISSION TO TEMPORARY ACCESS TO ITEMS AND DOCUMENTS

PROVIDING THE INVESTIGATING JUDGE OF EVIDENCE DURING GRANTING PERMISSION TO TEMPORARY ACCESS TO ITEMS AND DOCUMENTS

Pages: 43-57
Year: 2020
Location: Pravova Ednist Ltd

Review

Annotation. Judicial control is one of the key guarantees of legality and reasonableness of restriction of rights, freedoms and legitimate interests of a person in criminal proceedings, guaranteed by the Constitution of Ukraine. Judicial control in criminal proceedings is entrusted to the investigating judge. The effectiveness of the examination by investigating judges of petitions, complaints, allegations of procedural actions related to the restriction of rights, freedoms and legitimate interests of persons in criminal proceedings, evaluation of evidence on which they are based, as well as fairness, legality, motivation and validity of investigators relevant rulings and the legitimacy of the restriction of the rights, freedoms and legitimate interests of individuals in the course of their implementation certainly depends on the proper provision of evidence by investigating judges in criminal proceedings. The purpose of the article is to develop theoretical provisions and practical recommendations aimed at providing the investigating judge with evidence in criminal proceedings during the granting of permission for temporary access to things and documents. Problematic issues of providing the investigating judge with evidence during the granting of temporary access to things and documents have been identified: the lack of legal opportunity for the investigating judge to hear any witness, victim or to demand things or documents during the consideration of petitions; non-compliance by the parties to the criminal proceedings with the requirements of Part 2 of Art. 160 of the CPC of Ukraine during the preparation, submission and consideration of applications for temporary access to things and documents; the investigating judge does not have the authority to return petitions for temporary access to things and documents in case of their non-com-pliance with the requirements of Art. 160 of the Criminal Procedure Code of Ukraine; the absence in the CPC of Ukraine of a rule on the mandatory consideration of requests for temporary access to things and documents that contain a secret protected by law, in a closed court session; uncertainty in the CPC of Ukraine of the period during which the investigating judge must consider the request for temporary access to things and documents. It is concluded that the investigating judge, providing evidence when granting permission for temporary access to things and documents, when checking them in terms of legality and reasonableness must establish: 1) compliance of the request for temporary access to things and documents to the requirements, provided by 160 of the Criminal Procedure Code of Ukraine; 2) information contained in things and documents may be used as evidence in criminal proceedings; 3) if it is impossible to prove in other ways the circumstances which are supposed to be proved by means of these things and documents; 4) there is a real threat of alteration or destruction of things and documents that are important for criminal procedural evidence; 5) if they cannot be obtained as a result of the use of other means of obtaining evidence (demand of things and documents, conducting SRD and NSDS); 6) evidence confirming the arguments of the petition of the parties to the criminal proceedings. Keywords: investigating judge, securing of proof; criminal proceedings; judicial control; mechanism; powers. REFERENCES LIST OF LEGAL DOCUMENTS LEGISLATION
  1. Kryminalnyi protsesualnyi kodeks Ukrainy [Criminal Procedural Code of Ukraine]: Zakon Ukrainy vid 13.04.2012 № 4651-VI data zvernennia 30.10.2020 [in Ukrainian].
  2. Pro deiaki pytannia zdiisnennia slidchym suddeiu sudu pershoi instantsii sudovoho kontroliu za dotrymanniam prav, svobod ta interesiv osib pid chas zastosuvannia zakhodiv zabezpechennia kryminalnoho provadzhennia [On some issues of exercise by the investigating judge of the court of first instance of judicial control over the observance of the rights, freedoms and interests of persons during the application of measures to ensure criminal proceedings]: Informatsiinyi lyst Vyshchoho spetsializovanoho sudu Ukrainy z rozghliadu tsyvilnykh i kryminalnykh sprav vid 05.04.2013 № 223–558/0/4–13 data zvernennia 30.10.2020 [in Ukrainian].
  3. Uzahalnennia sudovoi praktyky shchodo rozghliadu slidchym suddeiu klopotan pro zastosuvannia zakhodiv zabezpechennia kryminalnoho provadzhennia (vytiah) [Generalization of case law on the consideration by the investigating judge of motions for the application of measures to ensure criminal proceedings (excerpt)] vid 07.02.2014 data zvernennia 30.10.2020 [in Ukrainian].
BIBLIOGRAPHY THESIS
  1. Farynnyk V ’Teoretychni, pravovi ta prakseolohichni problemy zastosuvannia zakhodiv zabezpechennia kryminalnoho provadzhennia’ [Theoretical, legal and praxeological problems of application of measures to ensure criminal proceedings] dys. … d-ra yuryd. nauk: 12.00.09. Kyivskyi natsionalnyi universytet imeni Tarasa Shevchenka. Kyiv (2017) 204 [in Ukrainian].
  2. Pohoretskyi M ’Kryminalni protsesualni harantii advokatskoi taiemnytsi u dosudovomu rozsliduvanni’ [Criminal procedural guarantees of lawyer’s secrecy in the pre-trial investigation] dys. … kand. yuryd. nauk: 12.00.09. Natsionalna akademiia vnutrishnikh sprav. Kyiv (2015) 238 [in Ukrainian].
  3. Burlaka O ’Zabezpechennia realizatsii slidchym suddeiu funktsii zakhystu prav, svobod ta interesiv osoby u kryminalnomu provadzhenni’ [Ensuring that the investigating judge implements the function of protecting the rights, freedoms and interests of a person in criminal proceedings] dys. … kand. yuryd. nauk: 12.00.09. Kyivskyi natsionalnyi universytet imeni Tarasa Shevchenka. Kyiv (2017) 154 [in Ukrainian].
  4. Shaputko S ’Povnovazhennia slidchoho suddi shchodo sudovoho kontroliu u kryminalnomu provadzhenni’ [Powers of the investigating judge regarding judicial control in criminal proceedings] dys. … kand. yuryd. nauk: 12.00.09. Kyivskyi natsionalnyi universytet imeni Tarasa Shevchenka. Kyiv (2017) 107– 108 [in Ukrainian].
AUTHORED BOOKS
  1. Udalova L, Rozhnova V, Savytskyi D, Ilieva T ’Funktsiia sudovoho kontroliu u kryminalnomu protsesi’ The function of judicial control in criminal proceedings] monohrafiia. Kyiv. «Tsentr uchbovoi literatury» (2015) 70 [in Ukrainian].
ARTICLES
  1. Shulhin S ’Tymchasovyi dostup do rechei i dokumentiv: problemy zakonodavchoho rehuliuvannia ta praktychnoho zastosuvannia’ [Temporary access to things and documents: problems of legislative regulation and practical application] Pidpryiemnytstvo, hospodarstvo i pravo 6 (2013) 141 [in Ukrainian].
  2. Podkovskyi O ’Tymchasovyi dostup do rechei i dokumentiv za novym KPK: problemy i shliakhy yikh vyrishennia’ [Temporary access to things and documents under the new СРС: problems and solutions] Slovo Natsionalnoi shkoly suddiv Ukrainy 3(4) (2013) 62 [in Ukrainian].
  3. Pohoretskyi M, Korovaiko O ’Zastosuvannia tymchasovoho dostupu do rechei i dokumentiv u kryminalnykh provadzhenniakh pro zlochyn, uchyneni orhanizovanymy zlochynnymy uhrupuvanniamy’ [Application of temporary access to things and documents in criminal proceedings against a crime committed by organized criminal groups] Borotba z orhanizovanoiu zlochynnistiu i koruptsiieiu (teoriia i praktyka) 1(29) (2013) 236 [in Ukrainian].
  4. Pohoretskyi M ’Tymchasovyi dostup do rechei i dokumentiv u slidchii praktytsi SB Ukrainy’ [Temporary access to things and documents in the investigative practice of the Security Service of Ukraine] Derzhavna bezpeka Ukrainy 22–23 (2014) 201–208 [in Ukrainian].
  5. Bahanets O ’Dokazuvannia storonoiu obvynuvachennia pryiniattia propozytsii, obitsianky abo oderzhannia nepravomirnoi vyhody sluzhbovoiu osoboiu: okremi problemni pytannia’ [Proof by the prosecution of accepting an offer, promise or receiving an improper benefit by an official: some problematic issues] Visnyk kryminalnoho sudochynstva 4 (2015) 154–159 [in Ukrainian].
  6. Makarov M Deiaki aspekty rozghliadu slidchym suddeiu klopotannia pro tymchasovyi dostup do rechei i dokumentiv’ [Some aspects of the investigating judge’s consideration of a request for temporary access to things and documents] Natsionalnyi yurydychnyi zhurnal: teoriia i praktyka 10 (2015) 104 [in Ukrainian].

PROVIDING THE INVESTIGATING JUDGE OF EVIDENCE DURING GRANTING PERMISSION TO TEMPORARY ACCESS TO ITEMS AND DOCUMENTS