ISSN 2413-5372, Certificate of state re-registration of КВ №25381-15321 ПР dated 01.07.2023.

Search

SCIENTIFIC - PRACTICAL JOURNAL "HERALD OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE"

Archive of Issues

POLITICAL PROCESSES VS LAWMAKING PROCESS: PROBLEMS OF CONSTITUTIONALIZATION

Pages: 124-138
Year: 2022
Location: Pravova Ednist Ltd

Review

Abstract. The article is devoted to the disclosure of the relationship, interaction and interdependence between political processes and the lawmaking process in terms of its constitutionalization. The main results of the study. The constitutionalization of the lawmaking process is defined as one of the ways of implementing the Constitution and introducing the rule of law into the regulation of public life, and therefore the lawmaking process includes not only a constitutional component, but also a political one. The author proves that political processes and the Ukrainian legislative process remain interdependent, which does not always lead to its constitutionalization, in particular, in terms of recognizing a person, his or her life and health, honor and dignity, inviolability and security as the highest social value and the State’s responsibility for its activities. It is substantiated that society and the public do not always perceive the constitutionality of those legislative reforms which have signs of a «legal revolution». Prompt corrective lawmaking, which began the implementation of all fundamental reforms, often leads to interference with fundamental human and civil rights and freedoms. Given the existence of destructive processes of statehood, the state of the lawmaking process is as complex as possible, and therefore requires a thorough constitutional technology. The author notes the significant role of the public in the lawmaking process as an expression of public expectations regarding the effectiveness of legislation. The constitutionalization of the legislative process in relation to revolutionary legal reforms is often not ensured, and if the draft laws are adopted as laws, the latter are subject to further review of the constitutionality of the amendments made, especially when the CCU has previously expressed a legal position on a particular issue and the legislator has re-enshrined similar legislative regulation, and often such legislative provisions are determined by the CCU to be inconsistent with the Constitution of Ukraine. Keywords: lawmaking process, constitutionalization, constitutionality, legal reforms, transitional society, political processes, corrective lawmaking. REFERENCES LIST OF LEGAL DOCUMENTS  LEGISLATION
  1. Pro vnesennia zmin ta vyznannia takymy, shcho vtratyly chynnist, deiakykh zakonodavchykh aktiv Ukrainy [On the amendment and recognition of some legislative acts of Ukraine as having lost their validity] Zakon Ukrainy № 76–VIII vid 28 hrudnia 2014 roku (2015) 6 Vidomosti Verkhovnoi Rady (VVR) 40 [In Ukrainian].
  2. Pro vnesennia zmin do deiakykh zakonodavchykh aktiv Ukrainy shchodo pensiinoho zabezpechennia [On making changes to some legislative acts of Ukraine regarding pension provision] Zakon Ukrainy vid 2 bereznia 2015 roku № 213-VIII (2015) 22 Vidomosti Verkhovnoi Rady (VVR) 145. [In Ukrainian].
  3. Pro derzhavnu sluzhbu [On civil service] Zakon Ukrainy vid 10 hrudnia 2015 roku № 889-VIII (2016) 4 Vidomosti Verkhovnoi Rady (VVR) 43 [In Ukrainian].
  4. Pro vnesennia zmin do deiakykh zakonodavchykh aktiv Ukrainy shchodo pidvyshchennia pensii [On making changes to some legislative acts of Ukraine regarding increasing pensions] Zakon Ukrainy vid 3 zhovtnia 2017 roku № 2148-VIII (2017) 40–41 Vidomosti Verkhovnoi Rady (VVR) 383 [In Ukrainian].
  5. Uhoda pro asotsiatsiiu mizh Ukrainoiu, z odniiei storony, ta Yevropeiskym Soiuzom, Yevropeiskym spivtovarystvom z atomnoi enerhii i yikhnimy derzhavamy-chlenamy, z inshoi storony [Association Agreement between Ukraine, on the one hand, and the European Union, the European Atomic Energy Community and their member states, on the other hand] Mizhnarodnyi dokument vid 27.06.2014 (2014) 75(1) Ofitsiinyi visnyk Ukrainy 83 [In Ukrainian].
CASES
  1. Rishennia Konstytutsiinoho Sudu Ukrainy u spravi za konstytutsiinoiu skarhoiu Mosiurchaka Vasylia Ivanovycha shchodo vidpovidnosti Konstytutsii Ukrainy (konstytutsiinosti) pidpunktu 1 punktu 2 rozdilu XI «Prykintsevi ta perekhidni polozhennia» Zakonu Ukrainy «Pro derzhavnu sluzhbu» vid 10 hrudnia 2015 roku № 889–VIII (shchodo harantii sotsialnoho zakhystu derzhavnykh sluzhbovtsiv) [The decision of the Constitutional Court of Ukraine in the case of the constitutional complaint of Vasyl Ivanovich Mosyurchak regarding compliance with the Constitution of Ukraine (constitutionality) of subparagraph 1 of paragraph 2 of Chapter XI «Final and Transitional Provisions» of the Law of Ukraine «On Civil Service» dated December 10, 2015 No. 889-VIII (regarding guarantees of social protection of civil servants)] № 3‑r/2022 data zvernennia 29.11.2022 [In Ukrainian].
BIBLIOGRAPHY AUTHORED BOOKS
  1. Transitions to Democracy: A Special Issue in Memory of Dankwart A. Rustow. (Apr., 1997), 263–283.
  2. The Political Economy of Democratic Transitions [The Political Economy of Democratic Transitions] 29(3) Comparative Politics: Transitions to Democracy: A Special Issue in Memory of Dankwart A. Rustow. (Apr., 1997), 263–283.
  3. Rose R, Mishler W, Haerpfer С, Democracy and Its Alternatives. Understanding Post-Communist Societies [Democracy and Its Alternatives. Understanding Post-Communist Societies] (Baltimore, (MD) Johns Hopkins University Press, 1998) 288.
  4. Schedler A, Electoral authoritarianism. The dynamics of unfree competition [Electoral authoritarianism. The dynamics of unfree competition] (Boulder, (CO): Lynne Rienner, 2006) 64.
  5. Acemoglu D, Robinson J, Why Nations Fail: The Origins of Power, Prosperity and Poverty (Crown Publisher, 2012) 529.
  6. Levitsky S, Ziblatt D, How Democracies Die What History tells us about our future (Crown, 2018) 301.
  7. Khotynskа-Nor O, Moskvych L at al other. Role of Confidence аnd Supply Chаin Strаtegy during Legitimizаtion of Justice in Countries of Trаnsitionаl Period. (2020) 534. data zvernennia 29.11.2022.
  8. Khantynhton S, Tretia volna. Demokratyzatsyia v kontse XX veka [Third Wave. Democratization at the end of the XX century] (2003) 368 [in Ukrainian].
  9. Kovalchuk V, Lehitymnist derzhavnoi vlady v pravovii teorii ta derzhavno-pravovii praktytsi [Legitimacy of state power in legal theory and state legal practice] (K. Lohos, 2011) 392 [in Ukrainian].
  10. Melashchenko V F, Osnovy konstytutsiinoho prava Ukrainy [Fundamentals of the Constitutional Law of Ukraine] (K.: Venturi, 1995) 173 [in Ukrainian].
  11. Melvyl A, Demokratycheskye tranzytii Teoretyko-metodolohycheskye y prykladnie aspekty [Democratic Transits: Theoretical, Methodological and Applied Aspects] (1999) 106 [in Ukrainian].
  12. Matsievskyi Yu, Trapped in hybridity: zigzags of the transformation of the political regime in Ukraine [Trapped in hybridity: zigzags of the transformation of the political regime in Ukraine] (1991–2014) (Books-­XXI, 2016) [in Ukrainian].
  13. Mykhaylchenko M I et al., Transformation of political institutions of Ukraine: problems of theory and practice (Kyiv, I. F. Kuras Institute of Science and Technology of the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine, 2016) 83 [in Ukrainian].
  14. Yushchyk O I, Theoretical foundations of the legislative process (K.: Parliament publishing house, 2004) 67–68 [in Ukrainian].
  15. Stoyko O M, Transformation of political institutions in modern transitional societies (Kyiv, Institute of State and Law named after V. M. Koretsky of the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine, «Logos», 2016) 151–152 [in Ukrainian].
ARTICLES
  1. Inglehart R, How solid is mass support for democracy – and how do we measure it? [How solid is mass support for democracy – and how do we measure it?] (2003) 36 Political Science and Politics 52.
  2. Levitsky S, Way L, Competitive Authoritarianism. Hybrid Regimes after the Cold War [Competitive Authoritarianism. Hybrid Regimes after the Cold War] (2010) Cambridge University Press 517.
  3. O’Donnell G, Why rule of law matters [Why rule of law matters] (2004) 15(1) Journal of Democracy 10.
  4. Howard M, The Weakness of Civil Society in Post-Communist Europe [The Weakness of Civil Society in Post-Communist Europe] (2003) Cambridge University Press. Print publication year 191.
  5. Waldron-Moore P, Eastern Europe at the crossroads of democratic transition [Eastern Europe at the crossroads of democratic transition] (1999) 32 (1) Comparative Political Studies 32–63;
  6. Reuveny R, Li Q, Economic openness, democracy, and income distribution [Economic openness, democracy, and income distribution] (2003) 36 Comparative Political Studies 589.
  7. Baev V T, Ystorycheskaia shkola prava: teoryia y polytycheskaia praktyka v Hermanyy v 1815–1848 hodakh [The Historical School of Law: Theory and Political Practice in Germany in 1815–1848] (2006) 6 Sovremennoe pravo 101–102 [in Ukrainian].
  8. Didych T O, Vzaiemodiia zakonotvorchosti ta politychnoho pliuralizmu v suchasnykh umovakh rozvytku Ukrainy [Interaction of law-making and political pluralism in modern conditions of the development of Ukraine] (2021) 12 Almanakh prava 73 [in Ukrainian].
  9. Kovalchuk V, Populizm i konstytutsiina transformatsiia u krainakh Tsentralno-Skhidnoi Yevropy ta Ukraini [Populism and constitutional transformation in the countries of Central and Eastern Europe and Ukraine] (2021) 8 Pravo Ukraini 168–185 [in Ukrainian].
  10. Kresina I O, Stoyko O M, Evolution of approaches to understanding the role of civil society in management processes [Evolution of approaches to understanding the role of civil society in management processes] (2021) 33 Rule of Law 543 [in Ukrainian].
  11. Liashenko R D, Ideolohichni oriientyry rozvytku zakonodavstva Ukrainy v umovakh pravovoho rezhymu voiennoho stanu [Ideological guidelines for the development of the legislation of Ukraine under the conditions of the legal regime of martial law] (2022) 13 Almanakh prava 254 [in Ukrainian].
  12. Murashyn O G, Status and prospects for the development of legislative activity in Ukraine [Status and prospects for the development of legislative activity in Ukraine] (2013) 1(2) Word of the National School of Judges of Ukraine 174 [in Ukrainian].
  13. Mykhailo S, Moral integrity of judges as a component of the rule of law [Moral integrity of judges as a component of the rule of law] (2019) 2 (2) Word of the National School of Judges of Ukraine 10 [in Ukrainian].
  14. Rastou D, Perekhodii k demokratyy: popiitka dynamycheskoi modely [Transitions to Democracy: The Demand for a Dynamic Model] (1996) 5 Polys 5–14 [in Russian].
  15. Savenko V, Teoretychni zasady doslidzhennia zakonu u strukturi pravovoi realnosti [Theoretical foundations of law research in the structure of legal reality] (2018) 4(16) Aktualni problemy pravoznavstva 14 [in Ukrainian].
  16. Slavna N V, zabezpechennia prav i svobod liudyny v umovakh pravovoho rezhymu voiennoho stanu v Ukraini v konteksti natsionalnoi stratehii u sferi prav liudyny [Ensuring human rights and freedoms under the conditions of the legal regime of martial law in Ukraine in the context of the national strategy in the field of human rights] (2022) 3 Elektronne naukove vydannia «Analitychno-porivnialne pravoznavstvo» 46 [in Ukrainian].
EDITED BOOKS
  1. Kugler J (ed), The democratic transition process [The democratic transition process] (1999) [in Ukrainian].
  2. Kresina I O (za red.), Derzhava i hromadianske suspilstvo v Ukraini: problemy vzaiemodii [State and civil society in Ukraine: problems of interaction] (Kyiv, Lohos, 2007) 6 [in Ukrainian].
DISSERTATION
  1. Berestova I E, Zakhyst publichnykh interesiv uchasnykiv tsyvilnykh vidnosyn: vzaiemozvʼiazok tsyvilnoho sudochynstva ta konstytutsiinoho provadzhennia [Protection of the public interests of participants in civil relations: the relationship between civil justice and constitutional proceedings] (dys…dokt.yuryd. nauk.:12.00.02+12.00.03. K. 2019) 407 [in Ukrainian].
  2. Bondarenko O V, Konstytutsiina modernizatsiia: ontolohichne rozuminnia, aksiolohichna znachushchist, komparatyvna tsinnist [Constitutional modernization: ontological understanding, axiological significance, comparative value] (dys…kand. yuryd. nauk.: 12.00.02. K., 2019) 31 [in Ukrainian].
  3. Bohachova O V, Teoretyko-pravovi zasady ta praktyka zakonotvorennia [Theoretical and legal principles and practice of law-making] (dys…dokt.yuryd.nauk.: 12.00.01. K. 2013) 512 [in Ukrainian].
  4. Bohdanova S D, Konstytutsiino-pravovi osnovy vzaiemodii Verkhovnoi Rady Ukrainy ta Konstytutsiinoho Sudu Ukrainy [Constitutional and legal foundations of interaction between the Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine and the Constitutional Court of Ukraine] (dys…kand.yuryd.nauk.: 12.00.02: 2021) 31 [in Ukrainian].
  5. Dzhuraieva O O, Funktsii suchasnoi derzhavy [Functions of the modern state] (dys. … kand. yuryd. nauk: 12.00.01. Odesa, 2006) 105 [in Ukrainian].
  6. Hunko N Yu, Zminy ta dopovnennia do zakoniv Ukrainy: zahalnoteoretychni ta tekhniko-tekhnolohichni pytannia [Changes and additions to the laws of Ukraine: general theoretical and technical and technological issues] (dys…kand.yuryd.nauk: 12.00.01: Lviv, 2019) 42 [in Ukrainian].
  7. Melnychuk S M, Pravovi formy realizatsii funktsii suchasnoi derzhavy Ukraina [Legal forms of implementation of the functions of the modern state Ukraine] (dys…dok.yuryd.nauk: 12.00.01. K., 2019) 102– 121 [in Ukrainian].
  8. Omelchenko N L, Konstytutsiino-pravovi osnovy zdiisnennia zakonodavchoi funktsii Verkhovnoi Rady Ukrainy [Constitutional and legal foundations of the implementation of the legislative function of the Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine] (avtoref. dys. … kand. yuryd. nauk: 12.00.02. K., 2011) 7 [in Ukrainian].
  9. Pohorielova Z O, Zakonodavchyi protses v Ukraini: problemy teorii i praktyky [Legislative process in Ukraine: problems of theory and practice] (dys…kand.yuryd.nauk. K., 2004) 10–11 [in Ukrainian].
  10. Shapran Yu V, Zakonotvorchist i politychnyi pliuralizm: Teoretyko-pravovi ta praktychni aspekty vzaiemodii [Legislation and political pluralism: Theoretical, legal and practical aspects of interaction] (dys… na zdob.nauk.stup.dokt.filosof. za spets. 081 Pravo. K. 2021) 82–87 [in Ukrainian].
  11. Yushchyk O I, Teoretychni problemy zakonodavchoho protsesu [Theoretical problems of the legislative process] (dys…dokt. yuryd. nauk: 12.00.01. Instytut derzhavy i prava imeni V. M. Koretskoho. K. 2005) 104 [in Ukrainian].
  12. Yushchenko O O, Konstytutsiino-pravovi zasady uchasti hromadian u zakonodavchomu protsesi Ukrainy [Constitutional and legal principles of citizens’ participation in the legislative process of Ukraine.] (dys…kand.yuryd.nauk: 12.00.02. Uzh. 2016) 13 [in Ukrainian].
WEBSITES
  1. Babenko K A, Politychni chynnyky vplyvu na protses realizatsii Konstytutsii Ukrainy [Political factors influencing the implementation process of the Constitution of Ukraine] data zvernennia: ­26.11.2022 [in Ukrainian].
  2. Chasopys Parlament [Chasopys Parlament] (2016) 4 Naukovo-populiarnyi zhurnal 7–8 data zvernennia 29.11.2022 [in Ukrainian].

Submission