ISSN 2413-5372, Certificate of state re-registration of КВ №25381-15321 ПР dated 01.07.2023.

Search

SCIENTIFIC - PRACTICAL JOURNAL "HERALD OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE"

LEGALITY AND VALIDITY OF THE INVESTIGATING JUDGE’S DECISION

LEGALITY AND VALIDITY OF THE INVESTIGATING JUDGE’S DECISION

Pages: 35-45
Year: 2022
Location: Pravova Ednist Ltd

Review

Abstract. The norms of Article 370 of the Criminal Procedure Code of Ukraine (CPC) define the normative content of the legality and validity of the court decision, which requires a special interpretation for application to the decision of the investigating judge. The purpose of the article is to establish the content of requirements for the legality and validity of the investigating judge’s decision and the conditions for their provision during the pre-trial investigation of criminal proceedings based on the study of the theoretical developments of scientists and the analysis of the norms of criminal procedural legislation. The research made it possible to draw the following conclusions:
  1. The legality of the investigating judge’s decision is ensured by: 1) the issuance of the decision by a competent subject; 2) proper establishment of legal and factual grounds for issuing a decision; 3) compliance with the procedural form of the decision. Proper establishment of the factual grounds for issuance the investigating judge’s decision of ensures the validity of the court decision.
  2. In order to make a legal and validity of the decision on the application of a measure to ensure criminal proceedings, the investigating judge must establish the legal and factual grounds for issuing the relevant decision, namely: compliance with the requirements of the Code of Criminal Procedure, which provide for its application, as well as the proper establishment of the circumstances that are the grounds and conditions for the application of the measure provision of criminal proceedings, based on the assessment of evidence from the point of view of their propriety, admissibility and credibility.
  3. The legality and validity of the investigating judge’s decisions on the conduct of investigative (search) actions and secret investigative (search) actions that limit the constitutional rights and freedoms of citizens are conditioned by compliance with the requirements of the Criminal Procedure Code regarding the content of the petition submitted by the investigator in agreement with the prosecutor or the prosecutor, and regarding its consideration by the investigating judge, during which the prosecutor, the investigator must prove the existence of sufficient grounds for conducting the corresponding investigative (search) action or secret investigative (search) action.
  4. The legality and validity of the investigating judge’s decisions, made based on the results of the review of complaints against the decision, actions or inaction of the investigator, inquirer or prosecutor during the pre-trial investigation, presupposes the establishment of compliance with the requirements of the Criminal Procedure Code of the object, the subject, the appeal period, compliance by the investigating judge with the procedure for handling complaints, finding out the circumstances that substantiate the claims of the complaint and objections against it, as well as other circumstances that are important for establishing the legality of the decisions, actions or inaction of the investigator, inquirer or prosecutor.
Keywords: criminal procedure, pre-trial investigation, court decision, investigating judge’s decision, legality and validity of the decision. REFERENCE LIST OF LEGAL DOCUMENTS LEGISLATION
  1. Konstytutsiia Ukrainy [Constitution of Ukraine] Zakon Ukrainy vid 28.06.1996 № 254к/96-ВР data zvernennia 15.08.2022 [in Ukrainian].
  2. Kryminalnyi protsesualnyi kodeks Ukrainy [Criminal Procedure Code of Ukraine] Zakon Ukrainy vid 13.04.2012 № 4651-VI data zvernennia 15.08.2022 [in Ukrainian].
  3. Pro Vyshchyi antykoruptsiinyi sud [On the High Anti-Corruption Court] Zakon Ukrainy vid 07.06.2018 № 2447-VIІІ data zvernennia 15.08.2022 [in Ukrainian].
  4. Pro sudoustrii istatus suddiv [On the Judicial System and Status of Judges] Zakon Ukrainy vid 02.06.2016 № 1402-VIII data zvernennia 15.08.2022 [in Ukrainian].
BIBLIOGRAPHY BOOKS
  1. Zakon Ukrainy «Pro sudoustrii i status suddiv»: naukovo-praktychnyi komentar [The Law of Ukraine «On the Judiciary and the Status of Judges»: scientific and practical commentary] / Pohoretskyi M A, Kuchynska O P, Khotynska-Nor O Z, Yanovskoi O H (Kyiv, Alerta, 2019) 668 [in Ukrainian].
  2. Pohoretskyi M A, Zakonnist. Velyka ukrainska yurydychna entsyklopediia: u 20 t. T. 19: Kryminalnyi protses, sudoustrii, prokuratura ta advokatura [Legality. Great Ukrainian legal encyclopedia: in 20 vols. Vol. 19: Criminal process, judicial system, prosecutor’s office and advocacy] (Kharkiv, Pravo, 2020) 282–284 [in Ukrainian].
ARTICLES
  1. Baulin O V, Poniattia yurysdyktsii i novyi Kryminalnyi protsesualnyi kodeks Ukrainy [The concept of jurisdiction and the new Criminal Procedure Code of Ukraine] (2013) 2 Yurydychnyi chasopys Natsionalnoi akademii vnutrishnikh sprav 9–13 data zvernennia 15.08.2022 [in Ukrainian].
  2. Overchuk S V, Pidsudnist kryminalnykh provadzhen slidchomu suddi [Jurisdiction of criminal proceedings to the investigating judge] (2015) 2(12) Chasopys Natsionalnoho universytetu «Ostrozka akademiia» Seriia «Pravo» data zvernennia 15.08.2022 [in Ukrainian].
  3. Pohoretskyi M A, Kryminalno-protsesualna forma [Criminal procedural for] (2012) 2 Visnyk Zaporizkoho yurydychnoho instytutu DDUVS 146 [in Ukrainian].
  4. Trofymenko V, Kryminalna protsesualna forma yak sotsialno-pravova tsinnist [Criminal procedural form as a socio-legal value] (2014) 4 (79) Visnyk Natsionalnoi akademii pravovykh nauk 154–164 [in Ukrainian].
  5. Pohoretskyi M, Teoriia kryminalnoho protsesualnoho dokazuvannia: problemni pytannia [Theory of criminal procedural evidence: problematic issues] (2014) 10 Pravo Ukrainy 12–25 [in Ukrainian].
  6. Pohoretskyi M A, Nova kontseptsiia kryminalnoho protsesualnoho dokazuvannia [New concept of criminal procedural evidence] (2015) 3 Visnyk kryminalnoho sudochynstva Ukrainy 63–79 [in Ukrainian].
DISSERTATION
  1. Burlaka O V, Zabezpechennia realizatsii slidchym suddeiu funktsii zakhystu prav, svobod ta interesiv osoby u kryminalnomu provadzhenni [Ensuring the implementation of the investigative judge function of protecting the rights, freedoms and interests of a person in criminal proceedings] (avtoref. dys. … kand. yuryd. nauk, Kyiv, 2018) 18 [in Ukrainian].
  2. Pieshyi D A, Zasada zakonnosti ta yii zabezpechennia u dosudovomu kryminalnomu provadzhenni [The principle of legality and his providing in pre-judicial criminal proceedings] (avtoref. dys. … kand. yuryd. nauk, Kyiv, 2016) 24 [in Ukrainian].
  3. Pshenichko C O, Povnovazhennia slidchoho suddi z rozghliadu ta vyrishennia skarh u dosudovomu provadzhenni [Powers of an investigating judge to review and resolve complaints in pre-trial proceedings] (avtoref. dys. … kand. yuryd. nauk, Odesa, 2014) 20 [in Ukrainian].
  4. Savenko M Ye, Apeliatsiine oskarzhennia ta perehliad ukhval slidchoho suddi, postanovlenykh pid chas dosudovoho rozsliduvannia [Appeal and review of the investigating judge’s rulings during the pre-trial investigation] (avtoref. dys. … kand. yuryd. nauk, Kharkiv, 2020) 20 [in Ukrainian].
  5. Shaputko S V, Povnovazhennia slidchoho suddi shchodo sudovoho kontroliu u kryminalnomu provadzhenni [The powers of an examining magistrate regarding judicial control in criminal proceedings] (avtoref. dys. … kand. yuryd. nauk, Kyiv, 2018) 21 [in Ukrainian].
  6. Tailiieva Kh R, Sudovi rishennia u kryminalnomu protsesi [Court decisions in criminal proceedings] (dys. kand. yuryd. nauk, Kyiv, 2016) 218 [in Ukrainian].
  7. Zavtur V A, Osoblyvosti dokazuvannia pry rozghliadi ta vyrishenni slidchym suddeiu ta sudom klopotan pro zastosuvannia zakhodiv zabezpechennia kryminalnoho provadzhennia [The peculiarities of proving in consideration and adoption of applications to enforce measures of ensuring criminal proceedings by investigating judge and court] (avtoref. dys. … kand. yuryd. nauk, Odesa 2018) 20 [in Ukrainian].
CONFERENCE PAPERS
  1. Pohoretskyi M A, Nepravosudnist i nezakonnist sudovoho rishennia: poniattia ta spivvidnoshennia [Injustice and illegality of a court decision: concepts and relationship] Suchasne kryminalne provadzhennia Ukrainy: doktryna, normatyvna rehlamentatsiia ta praktyka funktsionuvannia: materialy Vseukrainskoi naukovo-praktychnoi konferentsii (m. Odesa, 17 kvitnia 2015 r.) / vidp. red. Yu. P. Alenin (Odesa, Natsionalnyi universytet «Odeska yurydychna akademiia», 2015) 169–171 [in Ukrainian].

LEGALITY AND VALIDITY OF THE INVESTIGATING JUDGE’S DECISION