Review

Abstract. The article is devoted to the study of certain problematic issues of the prosecutor’s implementation of criminal procedural guarantees during a special pre-trial investigation. The authors determined the classification of the prosecutor’s criminal procedural guarantees as a party to the accusation and as a subject of proof in the differentiated procedures of the pre-trial investigation according to the criterion of differentiation of the procedural form of the pre-trial investigation. Peculiarities of implementation by the prosecutor of criminal procedural guarantees of the prosecution as a subject of evidence in a special pre-trial investigation (in absentia) have been studied. It has been proven that in order to carry out a special pre-trial investigation, the decision of the investigating judge on granting permission to carry out a special pre-trial investigation is necessary, the grounds for which are: 1) criminal proceedings carried out in connection with the crime committed by an adult, specified in part 2 of the article 297–1 or in the second paragraph of clause 20–1 of the Transitional Provisions of the Criminal Procedure Code of Ukraine; 2) the presence of factual data in criminal proceedings that give grounds to suspect a person of committing such a criminal offense; 3) the suspicion was reported to such a person in accordance with the procedure established by the Criminal Procedure Code of Ukraine; 4) the suspect has been hiding from the investigation authorities and the court for the purpose of evading criminal responsibility and has been declared an interstate and/or international wanted person, or who has been hiding from the investigation authorities and the court for the purpose of evading criminal responsibility for more than six months and/or for whom there are actual facts data that he is outside of Ukraine, in the temporarily occupied territory of Ukraine or in the area of anti-terrorist operation. It was concluded that the process of implementing the criminal procedural guarantees of the prosecution as a subject of proof in a special pre-trial investigation (in absentia) is characterized by a certain procedural limitation of the evidentiary activity of the prosecution in obtaining evidence or verifying it, the difficulty in comprehensively and fully establishing the circumstances that are included in the subject of the prosecution’s evidence, which is due, first of all, to the absence of such a participant in the criminal proceedings as a suspect in the criminal proceedings and, accordingly, the impossibility of the prosecution to use such an effective means of obtaining evidence or checking already received evidence as questioning the suspect or conducting other priority SRD with the suspect’s participation (presentation for identification, investigative experiment, simultaneous interrogation of two or more interrogated persons). Keywords: prosecutor, subject of proof, criminal procedural guarantees, pre-trial investigation, human rights.   REFERENCES LIST OF LEGAL DOCUMENTS LEGISLATION

1. Pro deiaki pytannia poriadku zastosuvannia zapobizhnykh zakhodiv pid chas dosudovoho rozsliduvannia ta sudovoho provadzhennia vidpovidno do Kryminalnoho protsesualnoho kodeksu Ukrainy [On some issues of the procedure for the application of preventive measures during pre-trial investigation and court proceedings in accordance with the Criminal Procedure Code of Ukraine] Informatsiinyi lyst Vyshchoho spetsializovanoho sudu Ukrainy z rozghliadu tsyvilnykh i kryminalnykh sprav vid 04.04.2013 № 511–550/0/4–13 [in Ukrainian].

CASES

1. Ukhvala Apeliatsiinoho sudu Kharkivskoi oblasti [Decision of the Court of Appeal of the Kharkiv region] vid 05.03.2018, sprava № 640/3198/17 data zvernennia 28.09.2022 [in Ukrainian].
2. Ukhvala Holosiivskoho raionnoho sudu m. Kyieva [Decision of the Holosiivsky District Court of Kyiv] vid 19.04.2018, sprava № 752/15027/15‑k data zvernennia 28.09.2022 [in Ukrainian].
3. Ukhvala slidchoho suddi Vyshchoho antykoruptsiinoho sudu [Decision of the investigating judge of the High Anti-Corruption Court] vid 26.02.2020, sprava № 991/1274/20. Ofitsiinyi sait «Iedynyi reiestr sudovykh rishen» data zvernennia 28.09.2022 [in Ukrainian].
4. Ukhvala slidchoho suddi Vyshchoho antykoruptsiinoho sudu [Decision of the investigating judge of the Higher Anti-Corruption Court] vid 2 veresnia 2020 roku, sprava № 991/7316/20 Ofitsiinyi sait «Iedynyi reiestr sudovykh rishen» https://reyestr.court.gov.ua/Review/91284811 data zvernennia 28.09.2022 [in Ukrainian].

BIBLIOGRAPHY ARTICLES

1. Baulin O, Spetsialne kryminalne provadzhennia u konteksti verkhovenstva prava [Special criminal proceedings in the context of the rule of law] (2017) 3 Naukovyi chasopys Natsionalnoi akademii prokuratury Ukrainy 1–7 [in Ukrainian].
2. Baulin O V, Pravovi sanktsii, prymus i vidpovidalnist yak harantii protsesualnoi samostiinosti prokurora u dosudovomu kryminalnomu provadzhenni [Legal sanctions, coercion and responsibility as guarantees of procedural independence of the prosecutor in pre-trial criminal proceedings] (2019) 3 Visnyk natsionalnoi akademii prokuratury Ukrainy 79–94 [in Ukrainian]. 8. Drozd V, Spetsialne dosudove rozsliduvannia (in absentia) yak dyferentsiiovana forma kryminalnoho provadzhennia [Special pre-trial investigation (in absentia) as a differentiated form of criminal proceedings] (2020) 7 Pidpryiemnytstvo, hospodarstvo i pravo 333–337 [in Ukrainian].
3. Halahan V, Udovenko Zh, Dotrymannia zasady nevtruchannia u pryvatne zhyttia pid chas spetsialnoho dosudovoho rozsliduvannia [Compliance with the principle of non-interference in private life during a special pre-trial investigation] (2015) 7 Pravo Ukrainy 10 [in Ukrainian].
4. Holosnichenko D I, Prokurorskyi nahliad: pytannia istorii ta suchasnoho zarubizhnoho dosvidu [Prosecutor’s supervision: issues of history and modern foreign experience] (2012) 2 (14) Visnyk NTUU «KPI»: zb. nauk. prats. Seriia «Politolohiia. Sotsiolohiia. Pravo» 80–85 [in Ukrainian].
5. Kalinnikov O V, Harantii prav pidozriuvanoho pid chas spetsialnoho dosudovoho rozsliduvannia (in absentia) za KPK Ukrainy [Guarantees of the rights of the suspect during a special pre-trial investigation (in absentia) under the Criminal Procedure Code of Ukraine] (2020) 2 (115) Naukovyi visnyk Natsionalnoi akademii vnutrishnikh sprav 35–42 [in Ukrainian].
6. Paliukh A, Protsesualne kerivnytstvo yak osnova dokazovoi diialnosti prokurora pid chas dosudovoho rozsliduvannia [Procedural management as the basis of evidentiary activity of the prosecutor during the pretrial investigation] (2017) 865 Visnyk Natsionalnoho universytetu «Lvivska politekhnika». Yurydychni nauky 474–482 [in Ukrainian].
7. Pohoretskyi N A, Sushchnost, obekt y predmet prokurorskoho nadzora za predvarytelnim sledstvyem [Essence, object and subject of the prosecutor’s supervision of the preliminary investigation] (1998) 35 Problemy zakonnosti: resp. mizhvid. nauk. zb. Kharkiv: Nats. yuryd. akad. Ukrainy 164–170 [in Russian].
8. Pohoretskyi M A, Dokazuvannia u kryminalnomu protsesi: hnoseolohichni i pravovi problem [Evidence in the criminal process: epistemological and legal problems] (2008) 3 Visnyk Akad. pravovykh nauk Ukrainy 266–275 [in Ukrainian].
9. Pohoretskyi M A, Kryminalno-protsesualni harantii derzhavnoi taiemnytsi: do vyznachennia poniattia [Criminal procedural guarantees of state secrecy: to define the concept] (2009) 11 Visnyk prokuratury 88–96 [in Ukrainian].
10. Pohoretskyi M A, Kryminalno-protsesualna forma [Criminal procedural form] (2012) 2 Visnyk Zaporizkoho yurydychnoho instytutu DDUVS 144–151 [in Ukrainian].
11. Pohoretskyi M A, Poniattia kryminalno-protsesualnykh harantii [Concept of criminal procedural guarantees] (2014) 2 Chasopys Natsionalnoho universytetu «Ostrozka akademiia». Ser.: Pravo data zvernennia 28.09.2022 [in Ukrainian].
12. Pohoretskyi M, Teoriia kryminalnoho protsesualnoho dokazuvannia: problemni pytannia [Theory of criminal procedural evidence: problematic issues] (2014) 10 Pravo Ukrainy 12–25 [in Ukrainian].
13. Pohoretskyi M A, Nova kontseptsiia kryminalnoho protsesualnoho dokazuvannia [New concept of criminal procedural evidence] (2015) 3 Visnyk kryminalnoho sudochynstva Ukrainy 63–79 [in Ukrainian].
14. Pohoretskyi M A, Sukhachova I O, Prokurorskyi nahliad za zakonnistiu vykorystannia materialiv operatyvno-rozshukovoi diialnosti na dosudovykh stadiiakh kryminalnoho protsesu [Prosecutor’s supervision over the legality of the use of materials of operative and investigative activities at the pre-trial stages of the criminal process] (2010) 4 Visnyk Akad. prokuratury 64–70 [in Ukrainian].
15. Pohoretskyi M, Prokuror u kryminalnomu protsesi: shchodo vyznachennia funktsii [Prosecutor in criminal proceedings: regarding the definition of functions] (2015) 6 Pravo Ukrainy 86–95 [in Ukrainian].
16. Pohoretskyi M A, Starenkyi O S, Naukovyi vysnovok shchodo tlumachennia okremykh polozhen chynnoho zakonodavstva Ukrainy (prytiahnennia narodnoho deputata Ukrainy do kryminalnoi vidpovidalnosti) [Scientific opinion on the interpretation of certain provisions of the current legislation of Ukraine (bringing a People’s Deputy of Ukraine to criminal responsibility)] (2017) 3 Visnyk kryminalnoho sudochynstva 234– 243 [in Ukrainian].
17. Pohoretskyi M A, Starenkyi O S, Oholoshennia osoby v mizhnarodnyi rozshuk: problemni pytannia [Declaring a person on international wanted list: problematic issues] (2018) 4 Visnyk kryminalnoho sudochynstva 71–88 [in Ukrainian].
18. Sharenko S, Shylo O, Spetsialne dosudove rozsliduvannia i sudove provadzhennia: problemni pytannia pravovoho rehuliuvannia [Special pre-trial investigation and court proceedings: problematic issues of legal regulation] (2015) 7 Pravo Ukrainy 58–65 [in Ukrainian].
19. Simonovych D V, Kryminalna protsesualna forma [Criminal procedural form] (2014) 5–2 (3) Naukovyi visnyk Khersonskoho derzhavnoho universytetu 233–235 [in Ukrainian].
20. Shevchyshen AV, Poniattia spetsialnoho dosudovoho rozsliduvannia (in absentia) ta yoho funktsionalne pryznachennia u kryminalnykh provadzhenniakh shchodo koruptsiinykh zlochyniv u sferi sluzhbovoi diialnosti ta profesiinoi diialnosti, pov’iazanoi z nadanniam publichnykh posluh [The concept of a special pre-trial investigation (in absentia) and its functional purpose in criminal proceedings regarding corruption crimes in the field of official activity and professional activity related to the provision of public services] (2017) 2 Visnyk kryminalnoho sudochynstva 125–134 [in Ukrainian].
21. Tymofeiev A O, Problemy praktychnoi realizatsii protsedury spetsialnoho dosudovoho rozsliduvannia (in absentia) v Ukraini [Problems of the practical implementation of the special pre-trial investigation procedure (in absentia) in Ukraine] (2021) 8 Naukovi zapysky NaUKM A. Yurydychni nauky 60–68
22. Udalova L, Pysmennyi D, Zdiisnennia kryminalnoho provadzhennia za vidsutnosti pidozriuvanoho, obvynuvachenoho [Conduct of criminal proceedings in the absence of the suspect, the accused] (2015) 7 Pravo Ukrainy 54 [in Ukrainian].

BOOKS

1. Bielousov Yu, Venher V, Milko V, Orlean A, Sushchenko V, Yavorska V, Prokuror: keruie? nahliadaie? rozsliduie?: zvit za rezultatamy doslidzhennia «Rol prokurora na dosudovii stadii kryminalnoho protsesu» [Prosecutor: does he manage? supervises investigates?: report on the results of the study «The role of the prosecutor at the pre-trial stage of the criminal process»] za zah. red. Bielousova Yu (Kyiv, ST-Druk, 2017) 268 [in Ukrainian].
2. Hroshevyi Yu M, Stakhivskyi S M, Dokazy i dokazuvannia u kryminalnomu protsesi [Evidence and proof in the criminal process] nauk.-prakt. posib. 2‑e vyd., stereotyp (Kyiv, KNT, Fursa S.Ya., 2007) 269 [in Ukrainian].
3. Honcharenko V H, Dokazuvannia v kryminalnomu provadzhenni: naukovo-praktychnyi posibnyk. Akad. advokatury Ukrainy [Evidence in criminal proceedings: a scientific and practical guide. Acad. of the Bar of Ukraine] (Kyiv, Pretsedent, 2014) 42 [in Ukrainian].
4. Kovalenko Ye H, Naukovi zasady kryminalno-protsesualnoho dokazuvannia [Scientific principles of criminal procedural evidence] (Kyiv, Yurinkom Inter, 2011) 448 [in Ukrainian].
5. Kryminalnyi protsesualnyi kodeks Ukrainy: komentari, roz’iasnennia, dokumenty [Criminal Procedure Code of Ukraine: comments, clarifications, documents] (2013) 157–174 [in Ukrainian].
6. Lazukova O V, Osoblyvyi rezhym dosudovoho rozsliduvannia v umovakh voiennoho, nadzvychainoho stanu abo u raioni provedennia antyterorystychnoi operatsii [Special regime of pre-trial investigation in conditions of war, state of emergency or in the area of anti-terrorist operation] (2018) 278 [in Ukrainian].
7. Pohoretskyi M A, Funktsionalne pryznachennia operatyvno-rozshukovoi diialnosti u kryminalnomu protsesi [The functional purpose of investigative activity in the criminal process] (Kharkiv, Arsis, LTD, 2007) 576 [in Ukrainian].
8. Shevchyshen A V, Dokazuvannia storonoiu obvynuvachennia u dosudovomu rozsliduvanni koruptsiinykh zlochyniv u sferi sluzhbovoi diialnosti ta profesiinoi diialnosti, pov’iazanoi z nadanniam publichnykh posluh: teoriia i praktyka [Prosecution’s evidence in the pre-trial investigation of corruption crimes in the field of official activity and professional activity related to the provision of public services: theory and practice] (2019) 536 [in Ukrainian].
9. Trofymenko V M, Teoretychni ta pravovi osnovy dyferentsiatsii protsesualnoi formy u kryminalnomu sudochynstvi [Theoretical and legal bases of differentiation of the procedural form in criminal proceedings] monohrafiia (2016) 304 [in Ukrainian].
10. Yurchyshyn V M, Protsesualni funktsii prokurora u dosudovii stadii kryminalnoho provadzhennia: poniattia, pryznachennia, systema [Procedural functions of the prosecutor in the pre-trial stage of criminal proceedings: concept, purpose, system] (Chernivtsi, Tekhnodruk, 2014) 276 [in Ukrainian].

 CONFERENCE PAPERS

1. Pohoretskyi M A, Kryminalno-protsesualni harantii: do vyznachennia poniattia [Criminal procedural guarantees: to the definition of the concept] Materialy II Mizhnarodnoi naukovo-praktychnoi konferentsii «Malynovski chytannia» (m. Ostroh, 15–16 lystopada 2013 roku) (Ostroh, Vyd-vo Natsionalnoho universytetu «Ostrozka akademiia», 2013) 289–292 [in Ukrainian].
2. Pohoretskyi M A, Suchasni kontseptsii kryminalnoho protsesualnoho dokazuvannia [Modern concepts of criminal procedural evidence] Suchasni tendentsii rozvytku kryminalistyky ta kryminalnoho protsesu: tezy dop. mizhnar. nauk.-prakt. konf. do 100‑richchia vid dnia narodzhennia prof. M. V. Saltevskoho (m. Kharkiv, 8 lystop. 2017 r.) MVS Ukrainy, Kharkiv. nats. un-t vnutr. sprav (Kharkiv, 2017) 309–312 [in Ukrainian].
3. Udalova L D, Pryiniattia rishennia pro zdiisnennia spetsialnoho dosudovoho rozsliduvannia [Making a decision to carry out a special pre-trial investigation.] Aktualni problemy dosudovoho rozsliduvannia: zb. tez dopovidei IV Vseukr. nauk.-prakt. konf. (Kyiv, 2015) 63 [in Ukrainian].

DISSERTATIONS

1. Trofymenko V M, Teoretychni ta pravovi osnovy dyferentsiatsii kryminalnoho protsesu Ukrainy [Theoretical and legal bases of differentiation of the criminal process of Ukraine] (avtoref. dys. … d-ra yuryd. nauk: 12.00.09 (2017) 27 [in Ukrainian].
2. Karpushyn S Yu, Provedennia slidchykh (rozshukovykh) dii [Conducting investigative (search) actions] (dys. … kand. yuryd. nauk: 12.00.09, 2016) 210 [in Ukrainian].
3. Kokoshko M V, Prokuror u kryminalnomu provadzhenni shchodo nepovnolitnikh [Prosecutor in criminal proceedings against minors] (dys. … kand. yuryd. nauk: 12.00.09, 2016) 220 [in Ukrainian].
4. Trofymenko V M, Kryminalno-protsesualni harantii osobystosti v stadii sudovoho rozghliadu [Criminal procedural guarantees of the individual in the stage of trial] (dys. … kand. yuryd. nauk: spets. 12.00.09. Kharkiv, 2000) 188 [in Ukrainian].

WEBSITES

1. Tatarov O Yu, Natsionalni osoblyvosti oholoshennia osoby v mizhnarodnyi rozshuk [National peculiarities of declaring a person on international wanted list] (2020) 16(1470) Zakon i biznes data zvernennia 28.09.2022 [in Ukrainian].