Review

Currently a number of pending issues have accumulated regarding the work of the operational units of the law enforcement agencies of Ukraine, which significantly reduce the effectiveness of their activities. These are, first of all, issues of legal regulation. Some are relate to the prevention of criminal offenses, detection and crimes counteraction by operational units. While the others issues are related to the participation of operational units in criminal proceedings. Given that, the first are due to gaps and collisions in the Law of Ukraine «On operational investigative activity», and the second are imperfection of provisions of the Criminal Procedure Code of Ukraine. But there is also a third group of issues. They are related to the fact that the activities of the same subject of crime counteraction (operational units), which provides for the use of identical methods and means, are legally delimited in different spheres of state and legal activities (operational investigative activity and criminal process) and are regulated by separate regulatory legal acts. The provisions of these acts on the activities of operational units are not sufficiently coordinated, unbalanced and require improvement. The accomplishment of this task is impossible without an understanding of the meaning of the activities of the operational units as subjects of crime counteraction, and this determines the relevance of this study.

The purpose of this article is to determine the theoretical basis of the legal status and content of the activities of the operational units of the law enforcement agencies of Ukraine as subjects of crime counteraction; to make proposals for improving the legal regulation of the status of operational units and the functions assigned to them.

The main results of the study is the formulation of proposals aimed at identifying ways to improve the legal regulation of the status and content of the activities of the operational units of law enforcement agencies of Ukraine. In particular, the proposed to introduce into legislation the definition of the concept of operational units as subjects, in accordance with the legislation of Ukraine, authorized to conduct operational investigative activities and function as part of law enforcement agencies, defined in Art.38 of the Criminal Procedure Code of Ukraine. In these conditions, it is necessary to legislate their classification, according to which these units will be divided into open (official) and covert. Open operational units operate as part of pre-trial investigation bodies, covert ones as part of a law enforcement agency, to which a pre-trial investigation body belongs, specializing in carrying out specific covert investigative (search) actions and similar operational investigative measures.

The practical implementation of the proposals will make it possible to equally effectively use the forces and means of operational units for: crimes prevention (activity that prevents the formation of the intention to commit crimes and (or) does not allow its realization, even in the form of preparation or an attempt to commit these crimes); crimes detection (activities on investigating and recording information about preparation for a crime; attempting to commit a crime; committing a completed crime); crimes suppression (the activity on preventing a crime that has already begun (including obstructing the preparation, attempt, and completion of the crime); crime investigation (the process of knowledge by the prosecution of the fact and circumstances of the commission of a particular action during the pre-trial investigation, which is embodied in the system of procedural actions used to accomplish the tasks of the criminal proceedings in general).

References

1. 1. Kryminalnyi protsesualnyi kodeks Ukrainy: Zakon Ukrainy [Criminal Procedural Code of Ukraine: The Law of Ukraine] vid 13.04.2012 № 4651-VI data zvernennia 03.12.2018 (in Ukrainian).
2. Pro operatyvno-rozshukovu diialnist Ukrainy: Zakon Ukrainy [On Operational and Investigative Activity of Ukraine: Law of Ukraine] vid 18.02.1992 № 2135-XII data zvernennia 03.12.2018 (in Ukrainian).
3. Hryniuk V O, Funktsiia obvynuvachennia v kryminalnomu provadzhenni Ukrainy: teoriia i praktyka monohrafiia [The Function of the Prosecution in the Criminal Procedure of Ukraine: Theory and Practice of the Monograph] (Kyiv, Alerta 2016) 358 (in Ukrainian).
4. Zakaliuk A P, Kurs suchasnoi ukrainskoi kryminolohii: teoriia i praktyka [Course of Modern Ukrainian Criminology: Theory and Practice: 3 books]: U3 kn. Kn. 1: Teoretychni zasady ta istoriia ukrainskoi kryminolohichnoi nauky (Vydavnychyi Dim «In Yurie» 2007) 424 (in Ukrainian).
5. Bandurka O M, Lytvynov O M, ’Systema protydii zlochynnosti: poniattia ta sutnist’ [Crime Counteraction System: Concept and Essence] (2015) 2(10) Visnyk kryminolohichnoi asotsiatsii Ukrainy 168– 177 (in Ukrainiаn).
6. Kolesnyk V, ’Nehlasni slidchi dii dlia slidchoho – «zolote dno», yake advokat zdaten peretvoryty v peklo’ [Investigatory Investigatory Investigations – The «Gold Bottom» That A Lawyer Can Turn into Hell] (2014) Zakon i biznes data zvernennia 21.12.2018 (in Ukrainian).
7. Kuts V, ’Protydiia zlochynnosti: sutnist i zmist’ [Counteracting Crime: Essence and Content] (2016) 4 Naukovyi chasopys Natsionalnoi akademii prokuratury Ukrainy 104–112 (in Ukrainian).
8. Kushpit V P, ’Operatyvno-rozshukova profilaktyka u systemi protydii zlochynam v Ukraini’ [Operational Investigative Prevention in the Crime Resistance System in Ukraine] (2015) 825 Visnyk Natsionalnoho universytetu «Lvivska politekhnika» 327–331 (in Ukrainian).
9. Lukianchykov Ye D, Lukianchykov B Ye, ’Stanovlennia instytutu nehlasnykh slidchykh (rozshukovykh) dii’ [Formation of the Institute of Involuntary Investigative (Investigative) Actions] (2015) 60 Krymynalystyka y sudebnaia эkspertyza 147–160 (in Ukrainian).
10. Podobnyi O O, ’Znachennia operatyvnoho poshuku v operatyvno-rozshukovii diialnosti ta v dosudovomu rozsliduvanni’ [The Importance of Operative Search in Operative-Investigative Activity and in Pre-trial Investigation] (2015) 3 Pivdennoukrainskyi pravnychyi chasopys 172–174 (in Ukrainian).
11. Pohoretskyi M A, ’Nehlasni slidchi (rozshukovi) dii: problemy provadzhennia ta vykorystannia rezultativ u dokazuvanni’ [Involuntary Investigative (Investigating) Actions: Issues of Proceeding and Using Results in Evidence] (2013) 1 Yurydychnyi chasopys Natsionalnoi akademii vnutrishnikh sprav 270–277 (in Ukrainian).
12. Pohoretskyi M A, Starenkyi S O, ’Chy ye zhyttia bez DBR?’ [Is there life without DBR?] (2018) 21 (1371) Zakon i biznes data zvernennia 03.12.2018 (in Ukrainian).
13. Serhieieva D B, ’Vykorystannia rezultativ nehlasnykh slidchykh (rozshukovykh) dii u dokazuvanni: shchodo udoskonalennia norm chynnoho KPK Ukrainy’ [Using the results of secret investigation (search) actions in proving: on the improvement of the norms of the current CPC of Ukraine] (2016) 1 Pivdennoukrainskyi pravnychyi chasopys 105–107 (in Ukrainian).
14. Starenkyi O S, ’Problemni aspekty zakonodavchoi rehlamentatsii provadzhennia nehlasnykh slidchykh (rozshukovykh) dii’ [Problematic aspects of the legislative regulation of the conduct of secret investigative (search) actions] (2013) 4 Naukovyi visnyk Dnipropetrovskoho derzhavnoho universytetu vnutrishnikh sprav 449–455 (in Ukrainian).
15. Starenkyi O C, Tsutskiridze M C, ’Vykorystannia nehlasnykh slidchykh (rozshukovykh) dii yak zasobiv dokazuvannia v kryminalnomu provadzhenni na dosudovomu rozsliduvanni’ [Use of Involuntary Investigative (Investigative) Actions as Means of Evidence in a Criminal Proceedings at a Pre-trial Investigation] (2015) Pravo Ukrainy 152–161 (in Ukrainian).
16. Stashchak M V, Mazur L A, ’Problemni aspekty zastosuvannia nehlasnykh slidchykh (rozshukovykh) dii operatyvnymy pidrozdilamy OVS Ukrainy’ [Problematic Aspects of Involuntary Investigation (Investigation) Operations by Operational Units of the Internal Revenue Service of Ukraine’ (2012) 6 (84) Customs Business] (2012) 6 (84) Mytna sprava 85–89 (in Ukrainian).
17. Tatarov O Yu, ’Okremi problemy pry provedenni nehlasnykh slidchykh (rozshukovykh) dii’ [Problematic Aspects of Involuntary Investigation (Investigation) Operations by Operational Units of the Internal Revenue Service of Ukraine’ (2012) 6 (84) Customs Business] (2016) 3 Visnyk kryminalnoho sudochynstva 69–77 (in Ukrainian).
18. Tishchenko V V, ’Rozkryttia zlochyniv yak piznavalna diialnist i osnovne zavdannia rozsliduvannia’ [Private Problems in Involuntary Investigative (Investigative) Actions] (2013) 13 Naukovi pratsi Natsionalnoho universytetu «Odeska yurydychna akademiia» 252–259 (in Ukrainian).
19. Cherniavskyi S S, Udalova L D, ’Gruntovne doslidzhennia teorii ta praktyky funktsii obvynuvachennia u kryminalnomu provadzhenni Ukrainy’ [A thorough investigation of the theory and practice of the prosecution function in the criminal proceedings of Ukraine] (2016) 4 Visnyk kryminalnoho sudochynstva 199–202 (in Ukrainian).
20. Shevchenko O A, ’Zapobihannia zlochynam yak odyn iz priorytetnykh napriamiv protydii zlochynnosti’ [Prevention of Crime as One of the Priority Areas for Combating Crime] (2012) 3 Pravo i suspilstvo 194–197 (in Ukrainian).
21. Albul S V, ’Novyi Kryminalnyi protsesualnyi kodeks Ukrainy: ruinuvannia nastupalnosti v operatyvno-rozshukovii diialnosti’ [The New Criminal Procedural Code of Ukraine: Destruction of Offensive Activities in Operative Investigation] Rol ta mistse OVS u rozbudovi demokratychnoi pravovoi derzhavy: V Mizhnarodna naukovo-praktychna konferentsiia (Odesa, ODUVS2013) 334–336 (in Ukrainian).
22. Vasylynchuk V I, ’Vzaiemodiia operatyvnykh ta slidchykh pidrozdiliv pid chas provedennia nehlasnykh slidchykh (rozshukovykh) dii’ [Interaction of operational and investigative units during the conduct
23. of secret investigative (search) actions] Aktualni problemy dosudovoho rozsliduvannia: IV Vseukr nauk. prakt. konf. (NAVS2017) (in Ukrainian).
24. Pcholkin V D, ’Poniattia ta rol operatyvno-rozshukovoi profilaktyky u zapobihanni zlochynam’ [Concept and the role of operative-detective prevention in preventing crime] Poperedzhennia zlochyniv subiektamy operatyvno-rozshukovoi diialnosti: materialy nauk. – prakt. konf. (Kharkiv, Khark. nats. un-t vnutr. cprav 2010) 15–17 (in Ukrainian).