The question of the expediency of sounding the competence of the investigating judge to the transfer to the competence of the investigator or the prosecutor of the full approval of the decision on temporary access to information of mobile operators is investigated. Given the amount and content of information to which this procedural action is directed, the potential possibility of limiting the provisions of Art. 32 of the Constitution of Ukraine the right not to interfere in private and family life in the application of this measure to ensure criminal proceedings. With this in mind, the position is defended on the optimality of the competence of the investigating judge determined by the legislator in this part and the inexpediency of changing the current legislation.

The proposal to improve the criminal procedure law in terms of legal regulation of the duty of the investigating judge to take into account the possibility of obtaining things and documents that can be used during the trial to establish the circumstances of criminal proceedings, without temporary access (Part 4 of Article 132 of the CPC)). In particular, it is concluded that despite the structural place- ment of this provision in Art. 132 of the CPC, which regulates the general rules for the application of measures to ensure criminal proceedings, used by the legislator in Part 4 of Art. 132 of the CPC, the phrase «get things and documents», argues that this requirement must be implemented by the investigating judge during the application for temporary access to things and documents, as none of the other measures to ensure criminal proceedings does not provide for such receipt.

Therefore, it is proposed to «transfer» this rule to Chapter 15 of the CPC, which regulates temporary access to things and documents. Also, for the purpose of effective implementation by the investigating judge of this normative requirement, it is deemed expedient to regulate the obligation of a party to criminal proceedings to provide in court a request for temporary access to things and documents with information on the results of: and / or (b) conducting investigative (search) actions aimed at obtaining the required items and documents.

Keywords: temporary access to things and documents; competence of the investigating judge; measure to ensure criminal proceedings; demand for things and documents.

1. On Advocacy and Advocacy: Law of Ukraine of July 5, 2012. № 5076-VI. <https://zakon.rada.gov. ua/laws/show/5076–17> [in Ukrainian].
2. On Amendments to the Criminal Procedure Code of Ukraine to Simplify and Improve the Current Norms of the Law in order to Avoid Punishment by Guilty Persons and Unloading of Judicial Bodies: Draft Law of Ukraine № 3303 of April 3, 2020. <http://w1.c1.rada.gov. ua / pls / zweb2 / webproc4_1? pf3511 = 68529> [in Ukrainian].

1. Ruling of the Investigating Judge of the Bar District Court of the Vinnytsia Region of 3 April 2020 (case № 125/386/20). <http://www.reyestr.court.gov.ua/Review/88608224> [in Ukrainian].
2. Ruling of the Investigating Judge of the Bobrynets District Court of the Kirovohrad Region of 27 February 2020 (case № 383/1017/19). <http://www.reyestr.court.gov.ua/Review/87876790> [in Ukrainian].
3. Ruling of the Investigating Judge of the Halych District Court of Lviv of 21 February 2020 (case no. 461/9167/19). <http://www.reyestr.court.gov.ua/ Review/87793556> [in Ukrainian].
4. Ruling of the Investigating Judge of the Dovhyntsi District Court of Kryvyi Rih, Dnipropetrovsk Oblast (Region) of 15 January 2020 (case no. 211/282/20). <http://www.reyestr.court.gov.ua/Review/86910320> [in Ukrainian].
5. Decision of the Investigating Judge of the Dovhyntsiv District Court of Kryvyi Rih, Dnipropetrovsk Region, dated 30 May 2019 (case № 211/1878/18). <http://reyestr.court.gov.ua/Review/82071430> [in Ukrainian].
6. Ruling of the Investigating Judge of the Ivano-Frankivsk City Court of the Ivano-Frankivsk Region of 9 April 2020 (case № 344/4687/20). <http://www.reyestr.court.gov.ua/Review/88679509> [in Ukrainian].
7. Ruling of the Kyiv-Sviatoshynskyi District Court of the Kyiv Region of 16 April 2020 (case № 369/4613/20). <http://www.reyestr.court.gov.ua/ Review/88843676> [in Ukrainian].
8. Ruling of the Investigating Judge of the Kominternivsky District Court of Odesa Oblast of 20 February 2020 (case № 504/4009/19). < http://www.reyestr. court.gov.ua/Review/87972175 > [in Ukrainian].
9. Decision of the Investigating Judge of the Kramatorsk City Court of the Donetsk Region of 5 March 2020 (case № 234/19606/19). <http://www.reyestr.court.gov.ua/Review/88250539> [in Ukrainian].
10. Decision of the Investigating Judge of the Malynovsky District Court of Odessa of January 10, 2020 (case № 521/124/20). < http://www.reyestr. court.gov.ua/Review/86876790 > [in Ukrainian].
11. Decision of the Investigating Judge of the Nizhyn City District Court of the Chernihiv Region of 23 April 2020 (case № 740/1698/20). <http://www.reyestr.court.gov.ua/Review/88896992> [in Ukrainian].
12. Ruling of the Investigating Judge of the Severodonetsk City Court of the Luhansk Region of 3 March 2020 (case 8428/6431/19). <http://www.reyestr.court.gov.ua/Review/88031037> [in Ukrainian].
13. Ruling of the Investigating Judge of the Tatarbunary District Court of Odesa Oblast of 15 January 2020 (case № 515/33/20). <http://www.reyestr.court.gov.ua/Review/86944619> [in Ukrainian].
14. Decision of the Investigating Judge of the Talnivsky District Court of the Cherkasy Region of 4 May 2020 (case № 704/346/20). <http://www.reyestr.court.gov.ua/Review/89094802> [in Ukrainian].
15. Decision of the Investigating Judge of the Ternopil City District Court of the Ternopil Region of January 10, 2020 (case №№ 607 / 45/20). <http://www.reyestr.court.gov.ua/Review/86846283> [in Ukrainian].
16. Decision of the Investigating Judge of the Ternopil City District Court of the Ternopil Region of February 25, 2020 (case № 607/3197/20). <http://www.reyestr.court.gov.ua/Review/87844176> [in Ukrainian].
17. Ruling of the Investigating Judge of the Shevchenkivsky District Court of Kyiv of 9 January 2020 (case № 761/48516/19). <http://www.reyestr.court. gov.ua/Review/87033431> [in Ukrainian].
18. Generalization of judicial practice regarding the consideration by the investigating judge of motions for the application of measures to ensure criminal proceedings dated 7.02.2014.<https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/ laws/show/n0001740–14> [in Ukrainian].

1. Antonov I.A., Uzgorskaya I.A. Influence of information provided by cellular operators on the disclosure and investigation of various categories of crimes. Society and law. 2015. № 2 (52). Pp. 185–189. <https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/vliyanie-informatsii-predostavlennoy-operatorami-sotovoy-svyazi-naraskrytie-i rassledovanie-razlichnyh-kategoriy-prestupleniy/viewer> [in Ukrainian].
2. Bezpaly T. Bill 3303 or more rights to investigators and prosecutors. <https://blog.liga.net/user/ tbezpalyy/article/zakonoproekt‑3303-abo-bilshe-prav-slidchim-ta-prokuroram> [in Ukrainian].
3. Shilo O.G. Competence of an investigating judge in criminal proceedings: theory, normative model and trends in legislation. Law of Ukraine. 2018. № 3. pp. 79–91. [in Ukrainian].

1. Makarov M.A. Judicial control in criminal process: theoretical and legal bases: dis. … Dr. Jurid. Science. 12.00.09. Kyiv, 2018. 495 p. [in Ukrainian].