One of the most important issues in the application of any coercive measures is the observance of fundamental human rights, the guarantees of which are enshrined in both international law and national law. In the theory of criminal procedural law, the application of coercive measures, in particular precautionary measures during criminal proceedings, is always relevant. Among all the precautions in scientific publications, considerable attention is paid to the issue of choosing and applying bail. However, there is no unambiguous approach among scholars and practitioners to the definition of many issues related to the definition of the grounds and subject of application of the pledge, the procedure for its payment, the amount of the pledge, etc. Currently, the issue of legislative definition of the grounds for restricting the choice and use of bail, as well as determining its size when choosing a measure of restraint in the form of detention in criminal proceedings for certain types of crimes.

The purpose of the article. Investigation of the issue of expanding the discretionary powers of the investigating judge, judges who give the right not to determine the amount of bail when choosing a measure of restraint in the form of detention in criminal proceedings for certain types of crimes.

The results of scientific research. Taking into account the analysis of domestic and foreign criminal procedure legislation, the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms, the case law of the European Court of Human Rights and decisions of the Constitutional Court of Ukraine, the author of the article examines and analyzes legislative initiatives. serious crime in the field of trafficking in narcotic drugs, psychotropic substances, their analogues or precursors, as well as in respect of a serious or particularly serious corruption crime. The inexpediency of introducing such restrictions through the prism of the essence, tasks and goals of precautionary measures in criminal proceedings, as well as the constitutional principles of human and civil rights and freedoms is substantiated.

REFERENCES LIST OF LEGAL DOCUMENTS LEGISLATION

1. Kryminalnyi protsesualnyi kodeks Ukrainy: Zakon Ukrainy [Criminal Procedure Code: Law of Ukraine] vid 13.04.2012 № 4651-VI <https://zakon.rada. gov.ua/laws/show/4651–17> data zvernennya 20.01.2020 [in Ukrainian].
2. Konstituciya Ukrayiny: Zakon Ukrayiny [Constitution of Ukraine: Law of Ukraine] vid 28.06.1996 № 254k/96-VR <http://zakon2.rada.gov.ua/ laws/show/254к/96-вр> data zvernennya 20.01.2020 [in Ukranian].
3. Pro vnesennia zmin do statti 183 Kryminalnoho protsesualnoho kodeksu Ukrainy: proiekt zakonu Ukrainy [On Amendments to Article 183 of the Criminal Procedure Code of Ukraine: Draft Law of Ukraine] vid 17.12.2019 r. reiestr. № 2611 <http://w1.c1.rada.gov.ua/pls/zweb2/webproc4_1?pf3511=67667> data zvernennya 20.01.2020 [in Ukranian].
4. Pro vnesennia zminy do statti 183 Kryminalnoho protsesualnoho kodeksu Ukrainy shchodo osoblyvostei vyznachennia rozmiru zastavy pry obranni zapobizhnoho zakhodu u vyhliadi trymannia pid vartoiu za vchynennia tiazhkoho abo osoblyvo tiazhkoho koruptsiinoho zlochynu: proiekt zakonu Ukrainy On Amendments to Article 183 of the Criminal Procedure Code of Ukraine Concerning the Peculiarities of Determining the Amount of Bail in Choosing a Precautionary Measure in the Form of Detention for Committing a Serious or Particularly Serious Corruption Crime: Draft Law of Ukraine] vid 18.12.2019 r. reiestr. № 2620. <http://w1.c1.rada.gov.ua/pls/zweb2/ webproc4_1?pf3511=67676> data zvernennya 20.01.2020 [in Ukranian].

    BIBLIOGRAPHY   EDITED BOOKS

1. Kryminalnyi protses: pidruchnyk [Criminal proceedings]. Yu.M. Hroshevyi, V. Ia. Tatsii, A.R. Tumaniants ta in., za zah. Red V. Ya. Tatsiia, O.V. Kaplinoi, O.H. Shylo. Kh.: Pravo, 2014. 284 s [in Ukranian].

  JOURNAL ARTICLES

1. Koriniak O, Praktyka zastosuvannia zapobizhnykh zakhodiv za novym KPK Ukrainy [The practice of applying precautionary measures under the new CPC of Ukraine. The first achievements]. Pershi zdobutky. Kryminalnyi protsesualnyi kodeks Ukrainy: pershi problemy ta zdobutky: materialy kruhloho stolu (m. Zaporizhzhia, 20.11.2013 r.). Zaporizhzhia, 2013. S. 52–55. [in Ukranian].
2. Zastosuvannia zapobizhnykh zakhodiv u novomu kryminalnomu sudochynstvi Ukrainy ta zakonodavstvi Yevropeiskykh krain [Application of precautionary measures in the new criminal proceedings of Ukraine and the legislation of European countries], proekt TASSh «Zmitsnennia sudovoi

systemy v Ukraini» ta Ukrainska pravnycha fundatsiia: Dopom. material. Odesa, 15–16 kvitnia 2002 r. [in Ukranian].

1. Mykhailenko V, Antykoruptsiina suddia poiasnyla, koly i ya e pryznachaietsia zastava. Ukrainske pravo. Elektronne vydannia. <https://ukrainepravo.com/news/ukraine/ antykoruptsiyna-suddya-poyasnylakoly-i-yak-pryznachayetsya-zastava/> data zvernennya 20.01.2020 [in Ukranian].
2. Tatarov O, Skasuvannia zastavy dlia koruptsioneriv: za i proty. Liha. Blohy. Ekektronne vydannia. <https://blog.liga.net/user/otatarov/article/19655> data zvernennya 20.01.2020 [in Ukranian].

  CONFERENCE PAPERS

1. Danchenko T.V. Mizhnarodnyi dosvid zastosuvannia zastavy [International experience in the use of collateral]. Suchasni pytannia ekonomiky i prava. 2011 r. Vyp. 2. S. 121–127 [in Ukranian].

  CASES

1. Rishennia Konstytutsiinoho Sudu Ukrainy vid 25.06.2019 r. № 7-rp/2019 u spravi za konstytutsiinymy skarhamy Kovtun Maryny Anatoliivny, Savchenko Nadii Viktorivny, Kostohlodova Ihoria Dmytrovycha, Chornobuka Valeriia Ivanovycha shchodo vidpovidnosti Konstytutsii Ukrainy (konstytutsiinosti) polozhennia chastyny piatoi statti 176 Kryminalnoho protsesualnoho kodeksu Ukrainy [Judgment of the Constitutional Court of Ukraine of 25.06.2019 № 7-rp / 2019 in the case of constitutional complaints of Kovtun Maryna Anatoliivna, Savchenko Nadiya Viktorivna, Kostoglodov Ihor Dmytrovych, Chornobuk Valery Ivanovych regarding the compliance of the Constitution of Ukraine (constitutionality) with the provisions of part five of Article 176 Of the Criminal Procedure Code of Ukraine]. Ofits. Visn. Ukrainy. 2019. № 62. St. 81. [in Ukranian].
2. Rishennia Konstytutsiinoho Sudu Ukrainy vid 19.10.2009 r. № 26-rp/2009 u spravi za konstytutsiinymy podanniamy Prezydenta Ukrainy ta 48 narodnykh deputativ Ukrainy shchodo vidpovidnosti Konstytutsii Ukrainy (konstytutsiinosti) okremykh polozhen zakoniv Ukrainy «Pro vybory Prezydenta

Ukrainy», «Pro Derzhavnyi reiestr vybortsiv», «Pro vnesennia zmin do deiakykh zakonodavchykh aktiv Ukrainy shchodo vyboriv Prezydenta Ukrainy» ta Kodeksu administratyvnoho sudochynstva Ukrainy (sprava pro vnesennia zmin do deiakykh zakonodavchykh aktiv Ukrainy shchodo vyboriv Prezydenta Ukrainy). Ofits. Visn. Ukrainy. 2009. № 82. St. 56. [in Ukranian].

1. Rishennia Konstytutsiinoho Sudu Ukrainy vid 01.06.2016 r. № 2-rp/2016 u spravi za konstytutsiinym podanniam Upovnovazhenoho Verkhovnoi Rady Ukrainy z prav liudyny shchodo vidpovidnosti Konstytutsii Ukrainy (konstytutsiinosti) polozhennia tretoho rechennia chastyny pershoi statti 13 Zakonu Ukrainy «Pro psykhiatrychnu dopomohu» (sprava pro sudovyi kontrol za hospitalizatsiieiu nediiezdatnykh osib do psykhiatrychnoho zakladu). Ofits. Visn. Ukrainy. 2016. № 48. St. 7. [in Ukranian].
2. Judgment case of case of Ilijkov v. Bulgaria (Application no. 33977/96). HUDOC Database. Strasbourg: European Court of Human Rights, 2001. <https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/rus#{%22fulltext%22:[%22\\%22CASE%20 OF%20ILIJKOV%20v.%20BULGARIA\\%22%22],%22documentcollectionid2%22:[%22GRANDCHAMBER%22,%22CHAMBER%22],%22itemid%22:[%22001–59613%22]}> data zvernennya 20.01.2020 [in English].
3. Rishennia Yevropeiskoho sudu z prav liudyny u spravi «Khairedinov proty Ukrainy» vid 14.01.2011 r. Ofitsiinyi Visnyk Ukrainy. 2011 r. № 74. St. 154. <https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/974_665#Text> data zvernennya 20.01.2020 [in Ukranian].

Key words: precautionary measure, bail, detention, investigating judge, judge, discretionary powers.