Review

Annotation. The provision on the administration of justice exclusively by courts, which is promulgated by the norms of the Constitution of Ukraine, the Law of Ukraine «On the Judiciary and the Status of Judges» and the Criminal Procedure Code of Ukraine, has a fundamental nature and corresponds to the main features of the principles of criminal proceedings. The purpose of the article is: to reveal the content of the principle of the administration of justice in criminal proceedings exclusively by courts in connection with the institution of jurisdiction, the modern judicial system in Ukraine, the exercise of powers by the court to administer justice in various stages of criminal proceedings and the goal of justice. The importance of jurisdiction for ensuring justice is emphasized, which consists in creating conditions for the implementation of the principles of criminal proceedings during the trial and the adoption of a lawful court decision. It was noted that an important guarantee of effective and fair justice is the proper organization of the judicial system and a clear and legally justified definition of the rules of jurisdiction. Within the analysis of the content of the principle of the administration of justice in criminal proceedings exclusively by the courts, it is substantiated that in accordance with the established system of the judiciary in Ukraine and the rules of jurisdiction provided for by the Code of Criminal Procedure, justice in criminal proceedings is carried out by local general courts, the High Anti-Corruption Court, appeals courts and the Supreme Court in the order specified by the Code of Criminal Procedure in the stages of court proceedings. Attention is paid to the implementation of the specified principle in various stages of criminal proceedings. It was concluded that the administration of justice by the courts takes place at all stages of the court proceedings when deciding the issues on the merits of the accusation: in the preparatory court proceedings, the court proceedings in the first instance, the proceedings for the review of court decisions in the appeal, cassation procedure, as well as in newly discovered or exceptional circumstances. The stages of law enforcement in the administration of justice by a court in criminal proceedings are distinguished: establishment of circumstances to be proven and other circumstances that are important for criminal proceedings; criminal qualification of the act; adoption and execution of a court decision. It is argued that the interconnectedness of the formal and substantive essential features of justice gives grounds for defining it simultaneously as an activity and as a goal. It was determined that the goal of justice in the judicial process is realized by the adoption of a legal, justified, motivated and fair court decision, which resolves the socio-legal conflict and ensures the protection of the rights, freedoms and interests of individuals. Keywords: principle of criminal proceedings, administration of justice in criminal proceedings, court, jurisdiction, goal of justice. REFERENCE LIST OF LEGAL DOCUMENTS LEGISLATION 1.Konstytutsiia Ukrainy [Constitution of Ukraine]: Zakon Ukrainy vid 28.06.1996 № 254к/96-ВР data zvernennia 04.05.2022 [in Ukrainian]. 2

1. Kryminalnyi protsesualnyi kodeks Ukrainy [Criminal Procedure Code of Ukraine]: Zakon Ukrainy vid 13.04.2012 № 4651-VI data zvernennia 04.05.2022 [in Ukrainian].
2. Mizhnarodnyi pakt pro hromadianski i politychni prava vid 16.12.1966 [International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, 16.12.1966] data zvernennia 04.05.2022 [in Ukrainian].
3. Pro sudoustrii i status suddiv [On the Judicial System and Status of Judges] Zakon Ukrainy vid 02.06.2016 № 1402-VIII data zvernennia 04.05.2022 [in Ukrainian].
4. Rishennia Konstytutsiinoho Sudu Ukrainy № 3-rp/2003 vid 30.01.2003 [Decision of the Constitutional Court of Ukraine № 3-rp/2003 dated 30.01.2003] data zvernennia 04.05.2022 [in Ukrainian].

BIBLIOGRAPHY AUTHORED BOOKS

1. Kuchynska O P, Pryntsypy kryminalnoho provadzhennia v mekhanizmi zabezpechennia prav yoho uchasnykiv [Principles of criminal proceedings in the mechanism of ensuring the rights of its participants] (Kyiv, Yurinkom Inter 2013) 288 [in Ukrainian].
2. Mykheienko М М, Problemy rozvytku kryminalnoho protsesu v Ukraini: [Problems of the development of the criminal process in Ukraine] (Kyiv, Yurinkom Inter 1999) 240 [in Ukrainian].
3. Pohoretskyi M A, Polovyi O L, Yanovska O H, Harantii suddivskoi nezalezhnosti pry prytiahnenni suddiv do yurydychnoi vidpovidalnosti [Guarantees of judicial independence when judges are brought to legal responsibility] (Kyiv, VD «Dakor», 2014) 308 [in Ukrainian].
4. Pohoretskyi M, Kryminalnyi protses [Criminal process] Velyka ukrainska yurydychna entsyklopediia: u 20 t. (Kharkiv, Pravo, 2016) T.19: Kryminalnyi protses, sudoustrii, prokuratura ta advokatura / redkol. V T Nor (holova) ta in. (Nats. akad. prav. nauk. Ukrainy, In-t derzhavy i prava im. V. M. Koretskoho NAN Ukrainy, Nats. yuryd. un-t im. Yaroslava Mudroho, 2020) 422–426
5. Shemshuchenko Y S (gol. red.), Yurydychna entsyklopediia [Legal encyclopedia] (Kyiv, «Ukrainska entsyklopediia» imeni M. P. Bazhana 1998) 736 [in Ukrainian].
6. Sudoustrii Ukrainy [The judicial system of Ukrain] / Pohoretskyi M A, Kuchynska O P, Yanovska O H ta in. / za red. M A Pohoretskoho, O H Yanovskoi (Kyiv, Yurinkom Inter, 2015) 26–35 [in Ukrainian].
7. Zakon Ukrainy «Pro sudoustrii istatus suddiv». Naukovo-praktychnyi komentar [The Law of Ukraine «On the Judiciary and the Status of Judges». Scientific and practical commentary] Pohoretskyi M A, Kuchynska O P, Khotynska-Nor O Z ta in.; za zah. red. d-ra yuryd. nauk, prof. M A Pohoretskoho, d-ra yuryd. nauk, dots. O Z Khotynskoi-Nor, d-ra yuryd. nauk, prof. O H Yanovskoi (Kyiv, Alerta, 2019) 668 [in Ukrainian].

EDITED BOOKS

1. Zaichuk O V, Onishchenko N M (za red.), Teoriia derzhavy i prava. Akademichnyi kurs [Theory of the state and law. Academic course] (Kyiv, Yurinkom Inter 2006) 688 [in Ukrainian].

ARTICLES

1. Baulin O V, Poniattia yurysdyktsii i novyi Kryminalnyi protsesualnyi kodeks Ukrainy [The concept of jurisdiction and the new Criminal Procedure Code of Ukraine] (2013) 2 Yurydychnyi chasopys Natsionalnoi akademii vnutrishnikh sprav 9–13 data zvernennia 04.05.2022 [in Ukrainian].
2. Pohoretskyi M A, Hrytsenko I S, Pravo na spravedlyvyi sud [The Right to a Fair Trial] (2012) 91 Visnyk Kyivskoho natsionalnoho universytetu imeni Tarasa Shevchenka. Yurydychni nauky 4–7 [in Ukrainian].
3. Pohoretskyi M A, Hrytsenko I S, Sudova vlada v Ukraini: do vyznachennia poniattia [Judicial power in Ukraine: to define the concept] (2012) 2 Pravo i suspilstvo 23–27 [in Ukrainian].
4. Pohoretskyi M A, Yanovska O H, Aktualni pytannia zastosuvannia mizhnarodnykh standartiv vidkrytosti sudovoi systemy v Ukraini [Current issues of application of international standards of openness of the judicial system in Ukraine] (2014) 2 (7) Slovo natsionalnoi shkoly suddiv Ukrainy 39–48 [in Ukrainian].
5. Pohoretskyi M A, Kryminalnyi protses: poniattia ta yoho metodolohichne i praktychne znachennia [Criminal process: the concept and its methodological and practical significance] (2021) 1–2 Visnyk kryminalnoho sudochynstva 88–93 [in Ukrainian].
6. M Pohoretskyi, Poniattia, zmist ta struktura kryminalnoho protsesu: problemy teorii ta praktyky [Concept, content and structure of the criminal process: problems of theory and practice] (2013) Pravo Ukrainy 42–54 [in Ukrainian].

DISSERTATION

1. Pieshyi D A Zasada zakonnosti ta yii zabezpechennia u dosudovomu kryminalnomu provadzhenni [The principle of legality and his providing in pre-judicial criminal proceedings] (avtoref. dys. kand. yuryd. nauk, Kyiv 2016) 24 [in Ukrainian].