Review

Annotation. Practices of defense counsel’s participation in pre-trial investigation of criminal offenses when applying measures to ensure criminal proceedings. The purpose of the article is to study the problematic issues of defense counsel’s participation in the pre-trial investigation of criminal offenses when applying measures to ensure criminal proceedings and to substantiate scientific proposals for their solution. It is proved that participation of a defense counsel in the pre-trial investigation of criminal offenses during the application of measures to ensure criminal proceedings is one of his/her main powers to implement the criminal procedural function of defense in criminal proceedings. The author emphasizes that the current CPC of Ukraine clearly defines the system of application of measures to ensure criminal proceedings, the grounds and procedure for their application. However, defense counsels, while exercising the defense function in the pre-trial investigation, in practice do not always take into account the specifics of application of each of such measures, do not always properly substantiate their legal position with evidence, and do not fully implement the theoretical developments of criminalists regarding the organization and tactics of defense counsel’s participation in the pre-trial investigation of criminal offenses when applying measures to ensure criminal proceedings. Based on the analysis of the results of the study of criminal proceedings, the author concludes that some defense counsels do not sufficiently substantiate their legal position when applying measures to ensure criminal proceedings with appropriate and sufficient evidence, which objectively does not allow the investigating judge to satisfy the defense counsel’s motion to apply certain measures of ensuring, change or cancel them. The author substantiates the position that in order to fully realize the defense function in the pre-trial investigation of criminal offenses when applying interim measures of criminal proceedings, the institute of attorney’s investigation should be introduced into the current CPC of Ukraine, which has already successfully functioned in various legal models of the world and has proven to be effective and an important tool for strengthening the adversarial principles of criminal proceedings at the pre-trial investigation. Keywords: defense counsel, measures to ensure criminal proceedings, measures, pre-trial proceedings, evidence, attorney’s investigation. REFERENCES LIST OF LEGAL DOCUMENTS LEGISLATION

1. Kryminalnyi protsesualnyi kodeks Ukrainy [Criminal Procedure Code of Ukraine] Zakon Ukrainy vid 13.04.2012 № 4651-VI data zvernennia 04.05.2022 [in Ukrainian].
2. Kryminalnyi protsesualnyi kodeks Ukrainy: naukovo-praktychnyi komentar: 2 (1) [Criminal Procedural Code of Ukraine: scientific and practical commentary] / O M Bandurka, Ye M Blazhivskyi, Ye P Burdol ta in.; (ed.) V Ya Tatsiia (Kharkiv, 2012) 768 [in Ukrainian].

BIBLIOGRAPHY AUTHORED BOOKS

1. Bilodid I K, Buriachok A A, Vynnyk V O, Slovnyk ukrainskoi movy [Dictionary of the Ukrainian language] u 11 t. (3) (Kyiv, Naukova dumka, 1970–1980) / Buriachok A A, Bilonozhenko V M, Biloshtan A P (1972) 541 [in Ukrainian].
2. Frank L V, Zaderzhanye y arest podozrevaemoho v sovetskom uholovnom protsesse (uholovnoprotsessualnыe y krymynalystycheskye yssledovanyia) [Detention and Arrest of a Suspect in the Soviet Criminal Process (Criminal-Procedural and Criminal Investigations)] (Dushanbe, 1963) 236 [in Russian].
3. Karneeva L M, Pryvlechenye k uholovnoi otvetstvennosty [Impeachment to criminal responsibility] Zakonnost y obosnovannost (Moskva, Yurydycheskaia lyteratura, 1971) 133 [in Russian].
4. Loboiko L M, Reformuvannia kryminalno-protsesualnoho zakonodavstva v Ukraini [Reform of criminal procedural legislation in Ukraine] (2006–2011 roky) Zahalni polozhennia i dosudove provadzhennia (Kyiv, 2012) 288 [in Ukrainian].
5. Loboiko L M, Kryminalnyi protses [Criminal procedure] (Kyiv, 2014) 340 [in Ukrainian].
6. Luk’ianenko Yu V, Yukhno O O, Zatrymannia osoby yak zakhid zabezpechennia kryminalnoho provadzhennia [Detention of a person as a measure to ensure criminal proceedings] (Kharkiv, Panov, 2016) 264 [in Ukrainian].
7. Pohoretskyi M A, Funktsionalne pryznachennia operatyvno-rozshukovoi diialnosti u kryminalnomu protsesi [Functional assignment of investigative activity in the criminal process] (Kharkiv, Arsis LTD, 2007) 576 [in Ukrainian].
8. Pohoretskyi M A, Yanovska O H, Advokatura Ukrainy [Bar of Ukraine] (Kyiv, Yurinkom Inter, 2014) 368 [in Ukrainian].
9. Pohoretskyi M A, Polovyi O L, Yanovska O H, Harantii suddivskoi nezalezhnosti pry prytiahnenni suddiv do yurydychnoi vidpovidalnosti [Guarantees of judicial independence in bringing judges to legal responsibility] (Kyiv, VD «Dakor», 2014) 308 [in Ukrainian].
10. Pohoretskyi M A, Kryminalnyi protses [Criminal process] Velyka ukrainska yurydychna entsyklopediia: u 20 t. (Kharkiv, Pravo, 2016) T.19: Kryminalnyi protses, sudoustrii, prokuratura ta advokatura / redkol. V T Nor (holova) ta in. (Nats. akad. prav. nauk. Ukrainy, In-t derzhavy i prava im. V. M. Koretskoho NAN Ukrainy, Nats. yuryd. un-t im. Yaroslava Mudroho, 2020) 422–426 [in Ukrainian].
11. Slovnyk ukrainskoi movy [Dictionary of the Ukrainian language] u 11 t. / redkol. Bilodid I K (holova), Buriachok A A, Vynnyk V O ta in. (Kyiv, Naukova dumka, 1970–1980) T.3 / Buriachok A A, Bilonozhenko V M, Biloshtan A P ta in. (1972) 541 [in Ukrainian].

EDITED BOOKS

1. Banchuka O A, Kuibidy R O, Khavroniuka M I(ed.), Naukovo-praktychnyi komentar do Kryminalnoho protsesualnoho kodeksu Ukrainy vid 13.04.2012 roku [Scientific and practical commentary to the Criminal Procedure Code of Ukraine dated April 13, 2012] (Kharkiv, Faktor, 2013) 846 [in Ukrainian]. ARTICLES
2. Andrushko P, Sukhov Yu, Pidozra v protsesi [Suspicion in the process] (2015) 22 Zakon i biznes data zvernennia 09.05.2022 [in Ukrainian].
3. Boiko V V, Konkurentsiia pravovykh norm. Zahalnoteoretychna kharakterystyka [Competition of legal norms. General theoretical characteristics] (2012) 1 (5) Chasopys Natsionalnoho universytetu «Ostrozka akademiia». Seriia: Pravo 1–14 data zvernennia 04.05.2022 [in Ukrainian].
4. Farynnyk V, Mirkovets D, Zatrymannia osoby v novomu Kryminalnomu protsesualnomu kodeksi Ukrainy: okremi pytannia vidpovidnosti mizhnarodnym standartam i praktytsi Yevropeiskoho sudu z prav liudyny [Detention of a person in the new Criminal Procedure Code of Ukraine: certain issues of compliance with international standards and the practice of the European Court of Human Rights] (2017) 6 Pidpryiemnytstvo, hospodarstvo i pravo 192–196 [in Ukrainian]. 1
5. Firman O V, Poniattia ta pidstavy dlia zastosuvannia zapobizhnykh zakhodiv [Concepts and grounds for the use of preventive measures] (2015) 2 (3) Naukovyi visnyk Khersonskoho derzhavnoho universytetu. Seriia «Iurydychni nauky» 122–128 [in Ukrainian].
6. Hryniuk V O, Starenkyi O S, Problemni pytannia povidomlennia pro pidozru suddi u kryminalnomu provadzhenni [Problematic issues of notification of suspicion of a judge in criminal proceedings] (2017) 12 Pravo Ukrainy 82–94 [in Ukrainian].
7. Hroshevyi Yu, Shylo O, Problemni pytannia zastosuvannia KPK Ukrainy pry obranni zapobizhnykh zakhodiv u kryminalnomu provadzhenni [Problematic issues of the application of the Code of Criminal Procedure of Ukraine when choosing preventive measures in criminal proceedings] (2013) 11 Yurydychnyi chasopys Natsionalnoi akademii vnutrishnikh sprav 216–224 [in Ukrainian].
8. Hladun O, Zelinskyi O, Povidomlennia pro pidozru: kryminalna protsesualna dykhotomiia [Notification of suspicion: criminal procedural dichotomy] (2018) 2 (54) Visnyk Natsionalnoi akademii prokuratury Ukrainy 58–72 [in Ukrainian].
9. Ivasiuk I H, Instytut «povidomlennia pro pidozru» novoho kryminalnoho protsesualnoho zakonodavstva Ukrainy [«notification of suspicion» Institute of the new criminal procedural legislation of Ukraine] (2013) 4 (22) Mytna sprava 74–79 [in Ukrainian].
10. Kaplina O V, Pidozra u kryminalnomu provadzhenni: poniattia, oznaky, sutnist [Suspicion in criminal proceedings: concepts, signs, essence] (2013) 1 Yurydychnyi chasopys Natsionalnoi akademii vnutrishnikh sprav 238–242 [in Ukrainian]. 24. Kaplina O V, Povidomlennia pro pidozru: protystoiannia pravovykh pozytsii storin obvynuvachennia ta zakhystu [Notice of Suspicion: Confronting the Legal Positions of the Prosecution and Defense] (2017) 12 Pravo Ukrainy 76–72 [in Ukrainian].
11. Krymchuk S H, Do pytannia povidomlennia pro pidozru okremii katehorii osib [On the issue of notification of suspicion to a certain category of persons] (2019) 6 Naukovyi visnyk publichnoho ta pryvatnoho prava 150 [in Ukrainian].
12. Lysiuk Yu V, Okremi aspekty nabuttia protsesualnoho statusu pidozriuvanoho u dosudovomu rozsliduvanni [Separate aspects of acquiring the procedural status of a suspect in pre-trial investigation] (2014) 11 (2) Visnyk Akademii advokatury Ukrainy 56–62 [in Ukrainian].
13. Maksymenko N, Poniattia ta pravova pryroda pidozry [Concept and legal nature of suspicion] (2018) 7 Pidpryiemnytstvo, hospodarstvo i pravo 164–168 [in Ukrainian].
14. Myronenko O, Vplyv spetsialnykh umov zastosuvannia ta obstavyn, yaki pry tsomu vrakhovuiutsia, na obrannia zapobizhnoho zakhodu [The influence of special conditions of application and circumstances that are taken into account on the selection of a preventive measure] (2014) 2 (14) Publichne pravo 89–97 [in Ukrainian].
15. Paliukh A I, Osoblyvosti uchasti prokurora v dokazuvanni obstavyn, yaki obgruntovuiut obrannia okremykh zapobizhnykh zakhodiv u kryminalnomu provadzhenni [Peculiarities of the prosecutor’s participation in proving the circumstances justifying the selection of certain preventive measures in criminal proceedings] (2016) 1 Naukovyi visnyk Lvivskoho derzhavnoho universytetu vnutrishnikh sprav 324–332 [in Ukrainian].
16. Posvystak O, Zdiisnennia povidomlennia pro pidozru osobam, shchodo yakykh zdiisniuietsia osoblyvyi poriadok kryminalnoho provadzhennia [Implementation of a notice of suspicion to persons subject to a special procedure of criminal proceedings] (2019) 5 Pidpryiemnytstvo, hospodarstvo i pravo 280–285 [in Ukrainian].
17. Pohoretskyi M A, Hryniuk V O, Povidomlennia suddi pro pidozru: problemni pytannia pravovoho rehuliuvannia, teorii ta praktyky [Notification of a judge about suspicion: problematic issues of legal regulation, theory and practice] (2018) 2 Visnyk kryminalnoho sudochynstva 58–71 [in Ukrainian].
18. Pohoretskyi M A, Poniattia, zmist ta struktura kryminalnoho protsesu: problemy teorii ta praktyky [The concept, content and structure of the criminal process: problems of theory and practice] (2013) Pravo Ukrainy 42–54 [in Ukrainian].
19. Pohoretskyi M A, Kryminalnyi protses: poniattia ta yoho metodolohichne i praktychne znachennia [Criminal process: the concept and its methodological and practical significance] (2021) 3 (4) Visnyk kryminalnoho sudochynstva 88–93 [in Ukrainian].
20. Pohoretskyi M A, Nova kontseptsiia kryminalnoho protsesualnoho dokazuvannia [A new concept of criminal procedural evidence] (2015) 3 Visnyk kryminalnoho sudochynstva Ukrainy 63–79 [in Ukrainian].
21. Pohoretskyi M, Teoriia kryminalnoho protsesualnoho dokazuvannia: problemni pytannia [Theory of criminal procedural evidence: problematic issues] (2014) 10 Pravo Ukrainy 12–25 [in Ukrainian].
22. Pohoretskyi M A, Dokazuvannia u kryminalnomu protsesi: hnoseolohichni i pravovi problemy [Evidence in the criminal process: epistemological and legal problems] (2008) 3 Visnyk Akad. pravovykh nauk Ukrainy 266–275 [in Ukrainian].
23. Pohoretskyi M A, Dokazy u kryminalnomu protsesi: problemni pytannia [Evidence in criminal proceedings: problematic issues] (2011) 1 (3) Chasopys Natsionalnoho universytetu «Ostrozka akademiia». Seriia: Pravo data zvernennia 04.05.2022 [in Ukrainian].
24. Pohoretskyi M A, Zatrymannia pidozriuvanoho: problemy obgruntuvannia rishennia [Detention of the suspect: problems of justifying the decision] (2007) 6 (20) Yuryd. radnyk 92–97 [in Ukrainian].
25. Pohoretskyi M A, Prytiahnennia suddiv do kryminalnoi vidpovidalnosti za st. 375 KK Ukrainy: problemni pytannia materialnoho ta protsesualnoho prava [Bringing judges to criminal liability under Art. 375 of the Criminal Code of Ukraine: problematic issues of material and procedural law] (2015) 2 Visnyk kryminalnoho sudochynstva 223–234 [in Ukrainian].
26. Pohoretskyi M A, Hryniuk V O, Povidomlennia suddi pro pidozru: problemni pytannia pravovoho rehuliuvannia, teorii ta praktyky [The judge’s notification of suspicion: problematic issues of legal regulation, theory and practice] (2018) 2 Visnyk kryminalnoho sudochynstva 58–71 [in Ukrainian].
27. Pohoretskyi M A, Mitskan O A, Standart dokazuvannia «obgruntovana pidozra» u praktytsi Yevropeiskoho sudu z prav liudyny: vplyv na vitchyznianu pravozastosovnu praktyku [The standard of proof «reasonable suspicion» in the practice of the European Court of Human Rights: impact on domestic law enforcement practice] (2019) 1 Visnyk kryminalnoho sudochynstva 37–49 [in Ukrainian].
28. Pohoretskyi M A, Tsyktich V M, Poniattia, sutnist ta vydy sudovoho kontroliu u dosudovomu provadzhenni [Concept, essence and types of judicial control in pre-trial proceedings] (2014) 3 (25) (2) Nauka i pravookhorona 178–186 [in Ukrainian].
29. Pohoretskyi M A, Mitskan O A, Standart dokazuvannia «obgruntovana pidozra» u praktytsi Yevropeiskoho sudu z prav liudyny: vplyv na vitchyznianu pravozastosovnu praktyku [The standard of proof «reasonable suspicion» in the practice of the European Court of Human Rights: impact on domestic law enforcement practice] (2019) 1 Visnyk kryminalnoho sudochynstva 37–49 [in Ukrainian].
30. Pohoretskyi M A, Vykorystannia materialiv operatyvno-rozshukovoi diialnosti dlia zatrymannia pidozriuvanoho [The use of materials of operative and investigative activities for the detention of the suspect] Mizhnarodna politseiska entsyklopediia: u T.10 T VI: Operatyvno-rozshukova diialnist politsii (militsii) / Kovalenko V V, Moiseiev Ye V, Tatsii V Ya, Shemshuchenko Yu S (Kyiv, Atika, 2010) 120–123 [in Ukrainian].
31. Pohoretskyi M A, Obgruntuvannia rishen pro zastosuvannia prymusovykh zakhodiv u kryminalnykh spravakh pro orhanizovanu zlochynnist [Justification of decisions on the application of coercive measures in criminal cases on organized crime] (2007) 15 Borotba z orhanizovanoiu zlochynnistiu i koruptsiieiu (teoriia i praktyka) 3–14 [in Ukrainian].
32. Pohoretskyi M A, Zatrymannia pidozriuvanoho: problemy obgruntuvannia rishennia [Detention of the suspect: problems of justifying the decision] (2007) 6 (20) Yuryd. radnyk 92–97 [in 47. Pohoretskyi M A, Hryniuk V O, Zasudzheni bez pidozry [Convicted without suspicion] (2018) 33 (1394) Zakon i biznes data zvernennia 04.05.2022. [in Ukrainian].
33. Pohoretskyi M A, Zatrymannia pidozriuvanoho: problemy obgruntuvannia rishennia [Detention of the suspect: problems of justifying the decision] (2007) 6 (20) Yuryd. radnyk 92–97 [in Ukrainian].
34. Pohoretskyi M A, Serhieieva D B, Taktyka zakhysnyka: poniattia, zmist ta mistse v systemi kryminalistychnoi taktyky [Defender’s tactics: concept, meaning and place in the system of forensic tactics] (2016) 2 Visnyk kryminalnoho sudochynstva 113–123 [in Ukrainian].
35. Pohoretskyi M A, Chornomorets T O, Realizatsiia povnovazhen slidchoho suddi z rozghliadu ta vyrishennia skarh uchasnykiv kryminalnoho provadzhennia na stadii dosudovoho rozsliduvannia [Implementation of powers of the investigating judge to consider and resolve complaints of participants in criminal proceedings at the stage of pre-trial investigation] (2014) 3 (3) Naukovyi visnyk Khersonskoho derzhavnoho universytetu. Seriia «iurydychni nauky» 282–288 [in Ukrainian].
36. Pohoretskyi M A, Kryminalnyi protses: poniattia ta yoho naukove i praktychne znachennia [Criminal process: the concept and its scientific and practical significance] (2021) 1–2 Visnyk kryminalnoho sudochynstva 28–51 [in Ukrainian].
37. Posvystak O, Zdiisnennia povidomlennia pro pidozru osobam, shchodo yakykh zdiisniuietsia osoblyvyi poriadok kryminalnoho provadzhennia [Implementation of a notice of suspicion to persons subject to a special procedure of criminal proceedings] (2019) 5 Pidpryiemnytstvo, hospodarstvo i pravo 280–285 [in Ukrainian].
38. Rybalko V O, Otsinni poniattia, vykorystovuvani pry rehlamentatsii zapobizhnoho zakhodu u vyhliadi osobystoi poruky [Evaluative concepts used in the regulation of a preventive measure in the form of a personal guarantee] (2015) 4 Naukovyi visnyk Lvivskoho derzhavnoho universytetu vnutrishnikh sprav. Seriia yurydychna 239–248 [in Ukrainian].
39. Skriabin O M, Problemni pytannia pidtverdzhennia povnovazhen zakhysnyka u kryminalnomu provadzhenni Ukrainy [Problematic issues of confirmation of the powers of the defense attorney in the criminal proceedings of Ukraine] (2013) 3 Visnyk Zaporizkoho natsionalnoho universytetu. Seriia «iurydychni nauky» 239–245 [in Ukrainian].
40. Skriabyn A N, Jetapy deistvyi zashchytnyka pry reshenyy voprosa ob yzbranyy merы presechenyia podozrevaemomu, obvyniaemomu v uholovnom proyzvodstve Ukraynы (2014) 19 (98), Seryia: Polytolohyia, Pravo, Ystoryia 60–68 [in Russian].
41. Skriabin O M, Uchast advokata pry vyrishenni pytannia pro obrannia pidozriuvanomu, obvynuvachenomu zapobizhnoho zakhodu u vyhliadi trymannia pid vartoiu [Participation of a lawyer in deciding the issue of selecting a preventive measure in the form of detention for a suspect or an accused] (2014) 2 (44) Derzhava ta rehiony. Seriia: Pravo 143–148 [in Ukrainian].
42. Skrypnychenko S, Osoblyvosti kryminalnoho provadzhennia shchodo okremoi katehorii osib [Peculiarities of criminal proceedings regarding a separate category of persons] (2014) 1 (34) Visnyk Natsionalnoi akademii prokuratury Ukrainy 118–125 [in Ukrainian].
43. Smokov C, Kryminalno-protsesualni harantii pry zastosuvanni zapobizhnoho zakhodu u vyhliadi osobystoi poruky [Criminal procedural guarantees when a preventive measure is applied in the form of a personal guarantee] (2013) 11 Pravo Ukrainy 242–249 [in Ukrainian].
44. Velyhorodskyi V V, Sudebnaia reforma y problemы ynstytuta podozrenyia v rossyiskom uholovnom sudoproyzvodstve [Judicial reform and problems of the institution of suspicion in Russian criminal justice] (2008) 1 Aktualnыe problemы rossyiskoho prava 277–283 [in Russian].
45. Sukhov Yu, Yaki vymohy vysuvaie KPK do zdiisnennia kryminalnoho provadzhennia stosovno profesiinoho suddi [What are the requirements of the KPK for conducting criminal proceedings against a professional judge] (2015) 22 (1216) Zakon i biznes data zvernennia 04.05.2022 [in Ukrainian].
46. Zavtur V, Obgruntuvannia ukhval slidchoho suddi pro zastosuvannia zapobizhnoho zakhodu u vyhliadi zastavy: analiz problem ta shliakhy vdoskonalennia [Justification of decisions of the investigating judge on the application of a preventive measure in the form of bail: analysis of problems and ways of improvement] (2015) 12 Visnyk prokuratury: zahalnoderzhavne fakhove yurydychne vydannia 87–95 [in Ukrainian].

CONFERENCE PAPERS

1. Hapotchenko H M, Aktualni pytannia zastosuvannia osobystoi poruky za novym Kryminalnym protsesualnym kodeksom Ukrainy [Current issues of applying personal bail under the new Criminal Procedure Code of Ukraine] Aktualni problemy zastosuvannia novoho kryminalnoho protsesualnoho zakonodavstva Ukrainy ta tendentsii rozvytku kryminalistyky na suchasnomu etapi: materialy Vseukrainskoi naukovopraktychnoi konferentsii (m. Kharkiv, 5 zhovtnia 2012 r.) (Kharkiv, KhNUVS, 2012) 198–204 [in Ukrainian].
2. Lukashkina T V, Umovy ta pidstavy zastosuvannia zapobizhnykh zakhodiv za chynnym KPK Ukrainy [Conditions and grounds for the application of preventive measures under the current Code of Criminal Procedure of Ukraine] Pravove zhyttia suchasnoi Ukrainy: materialy Mizhnarodnoi naukovo-praktychnoi konferentsii, prysviachenoi yuvileiu akademika S. V. Kivalova (m. Odesa, 16–17 travnia 2014 r.) 2- (1) (Odesa, 2014) 683–686 [in Ukrainian].
3. Pohoretskyi M A, Zakhysnyk – sub’iekt dokazuvannia u kryminalnomu protsesi [The defender is the subject of evidence in the criminal process] Orhanizatsiia advokatury i nadannia pravovoi dopomohy v demokratychnomu suspilstvi: dopovidi uchasnykiv mizhn. nauk. – prakt. konf. (18–19 zhovt. 2002 r., Kyiv, IA pry KU im. T. Shevchenka) 27–30 [in Ukrainian].
4. Pohoretskyi M A, Kontseptsii kryminalnoho protsesualnoho dokazuvannia [Concepts of criminal procedural evidence] Suchasni kontseptsii dokazuvannia i dokaziv u yurydychnomu protsesi krain blyzhnoho zarubizhzhia ta yikh vplyv na formuvannia yedynoi sudovoi praktyky: materialy nauk. – metodoloh. seminaru (m. Kyiv, 16 lystop. 2012 r.) / M Ye Shumylo (Kharkiv, Pravo, 2020) 20–29 [in Ukrainian].
5. Pohoretskyi M A, Nova kontseptsiia kryminalnoho protsesualnoho dokazuvannia ta yii realizatsiia v chynnomu KPK Ukrainy [The new concept of criminal procedural evidence and its implementation in the current Code of Criminal Procedure of Ukraine] Aktualni pytannia dokazuvannia u kryminalnomu protsesi: zbirnyk materialiv naukovo-praktychnoi konferentsii (Kyiv, Vydavets, 2015) 22–27 [in Ukrainian].
6. Pohoretskyi M A, Dokazuvannia u kryminalnomu protsesi: poniattia, zmist, struktura [Evidence in the criminal process: concept, content, structure] Aktualni problemy dokazuvannia u kryminalnomu provadzhenni: materialy Vseukrainskoi naukovo-praktychnoi Internet-konferentsii (27 lystopada 2013 r., m. Odesa) / Yu P Alenin (Odesa, Yurydychna literatura, 2013) 17–21 [in Ukrainian].
7. Pohoretskyi M A, Aresht maina: problemni pytannia [Seizure of property: problematic issues] Aktualni problemy vyiavlennia ta prypynennia zlochyniv: materialy kruhloho stolu (Kyiv, 27 lystopada 2014 roku) / S S Cherniavskyi, M M Aleksiichuk, O V Khutorianskyi, V R Slyvenko, P V Derev’ianko, V I Vasylynchuk (Kyiv, FOP Kandyba T P, 2014) 142–145 [in Ukrainian].
8. Pohoretskyi M A, Sudovyi kontrol za zakonnistiu obrannia zapobizhnoho zakhodu vziattia pid vartu [Judicial control over the legality of choosing a preventive measure of detention] Problemy zastosuvannia kryminalno-protsesualnoho prymusu pid chas dosudovoho provadzhennia: mater. kruhloho stolu (Dnipropetrovsk, 22 lystop. 2011 r.) (Dnipropetrovsk, Dniprop. derzh. un-t vutr. sprav, 2012) 135–138 [in Ukrainian].
9. Pohoretskyi M A, Rol zakhysnyka pry obranni zapobizhnoho zakhodu pidpysky pro nevyizd [The role of the defense attorney when choosing a restraining order] Rol zakhysnyka na dosudovomu slidstvi pry obranni zapobizhnykh zakhodiv ne pov’iazanykh z vziattiam pid vartu: materialy mizhn. nauk. – prakt. konf. (m. Kharkiv, 22–23 liut. 2006 r.) / V V Stashys (Kyiv, PP «SERHA», 2006) 114–118 [in Ukrainian].
10. Pohoretskyi M A, Vykorystannia materialiv operatyvno-rozshukovoi diialnosti yak pidstav dlia zatrymannia pidozriuvanoho [The use of materials of operative and investigative activity as a basis for detaining a suspect] Protsesualni harantii dotrymannia konstytutsiinykh prav hromadian u kryminalnomu sudochynstvi: materialy Vseukr. nauk. – prakt. konf. (m. Donetsk, 26 lystop. 2004 r.) (Donetsk, DIVS, 2005) 9–13 [in Ukrainian].
11. Pohoretskyi M A, Formuvannia vnutrishnoho perekonannia slidchoho pry pryiniatti protsesualnykh rishen na pidstavi materialiv operatyvno-rozshukovoi diialnosti [Formation of the internal conviction of the investigator when making procedural decisions on the basis of materials of operative and investigative activities] Filosofski, metodolohichni y psykholohichni problemy prava: tezy dop. III Vseukr. nauk-teoret. konf. (m. Kyiv, 23 kvit. 2010 r.) / V V Kovalenko, M V Kostytskyi, O M Dzhuzha (Kyiv, Kyiv. nats. un-t vnutr. sprav, 2010) 171–173 [in Ukrainian].
12. Pohoretskyi M A, Zakhysnyk – sub’iekt dokazuvannia na dosudovomu provadzhenni za chynnym KPK Ukrainy: problemni pytannia [The defender is the subject of evidence in pre-trial proceedings under the current Code of Criminal Procedure of Ukraine: problematic issues] Aktualni pytannia derzhavotvorennia v Ukraini: materialy mizhnarodnoi naukovo-praktychnoi konferentsii (m. Kyiv, 23 travnia 2014 r.) (Kyiv, PrintServis, 2014) 480–482 [in Ukrainian].
13. Soldatenko O A, Teoretychni ta praktychni pytannia zatrymannia osoby za chynnym KPK Ukrainy [Theoretical and practical issues of detaining a person under the current Code of Criminal Procedure of Ukraine] Reformuvannia orhaniv vnutrishnikh sprav: problemy ta perspektyvy (vitchyznianyi i zarubizhnyi dosvid): materialy mizhnarodnoi naukovo-praktychnoi konferentsii (Dnipropetrovsk, Dniprop. derzh. un-t vnutr. sprav, 2014) 95–98 [in Ukrainian].

DISSERTATIONS

1. Babich L M, Zastava yak vyd zapobizhnoho zakhodu u kryminalnomu sudochynstvi [Bail as a type of preventive measure in the criminal justice system of Ukraine] (dys. … kand. yuryd. nauk: 12.00.09. Luhansk, 2014) 250 [in Ukrainian].
2. Drozd A V, Zabezpechennia nedotorkannosti prava vlasnosti v kryminalnomu provadzhenni [Ensuring the inviolability of property rights in criminal proceedings] (dys. … kand. yuryd. nauk: 12.00.09. Kharkiv, 2019) 241 [in Ukrainian]. 77. Dubivka I V, Diialnist advokata v stadii dosudovoho rozsliduvannia [Activities of the lawyer in the stage of pre-trial investigation] (dys. … kand. yuryd. nauk: 12.00.09. Kyiv, 2017) 233 [in Ukrainian].
3. Fomina T H, Teoretychni ta protsesualni osnovy zastosuvannia zapobizhnykh zakhodiv u kryminalnomu sudochynstvi Ukrainy [Theoretical and procedural foundations of the application of preventive measures in the criminal justice system of Ukraine] (dys. … d-ra yuryd. nauk: 12.00.09. Kharkiv, 2020) 629 [in Ukrainian].
4. Malanchuk P M, Funktsiia zakhystu v kryminalnomu protsesi Ukrainy [The function of defense in the criminal process of Ukraine] (dys. … kand. yuryd. nauk: 12.00.09. Kyiv, 2007) 201 [in Ukrainian].
5. Ostrohliad O V, Zdiisnennia advokatom zakhystu u stadii apeliatsiinoho perehliadu rishen sudu pershoi instantsii [Implementation of defense by a lawyer at the stage of appellate review of decisions of the court of first instance] (dys. … kand. yuryd. nauk: 12.00.09. Ivano-Frankivsk, 2007) 194 [in Ukrainian].
6. Skriabin O M, Zakhysnyk v kryminalnomu protsesi: normatyvno-pravove doslidzhennia [Defense counsel in criminal proceedings: normative and legal research] (dys. … d-ra yuryd. nauk: 12.00.09. Zaporizhzhia, 2017) 455 [in Ukrainian].
7. Zavtur V A, Osoblyvosti dokazuvannia pry rozghliadi ta vyrishenni slidchym suddeiu ta sudom klopotan pro zastosuvannia zakhodiv zabezpechennia kryminalnoho provadzhennia [Peculiarities of proof during the consideration and decision by the investigating judge and the court of requests for the application of measures to ensure criminal proceedings] (dys. … kand. yuryd. nauk: 12.00.09. Odesa, 2017) 225 [in Ukrainian].

WEBSITES

1. Yaki vymohy vysuvaie KPK do zdiisnennia kryminalnoho provadzhennia stosovno profesiinoho suddi [What are the requirements of the Criminal Procedure Code for conducting criminal proceedings against a professional judge?] data zvernennia 04.05.2022.