ISSN 2413-5372, Свідоцтво про державну перереєстрацію КВ №25381-15321 ПР від 07.01.2023 р.
Search

НАУКОВО-ПРАКТИЧНИЙ ЖУРНАЛ "ВІСНИК КРИМІНАЛЬНОГО СУДОЧИНСТВА"

Архів номерів


Warning: Attempt to read property "term_id" on bool in /home/kc4l2wt28vsl/vhosts/vkslaw.knu.ua/www/wp-content/plugins/my_library/assets/front-main.php on line 119

Functional structure of pre-trial investigation in the criminal process of France and Ukraine (comparative legal research)

Сторінки: 170-180
Рік: 2018
Видавець: ТОВ "Правова Єдність"
Скачати файл: 1_2018_Muhayluk.pdf

Анотація

The article is devoted to comparative and legal research of models of pre - trial investigation of France and Ukraine. The current model of pre-trial investigation in Ukraine continues to show its inadequate efficiency in determining the actual circumstances of the case, impartial investigation, numerous violations of human rights and citizen. The purpose of this article is to develop further proposals to create a real, efficient, economic model of pre-trial investigation in guaranteeing of human and civil rights and freedoms in Ukraine.

This article describes and compares the powers of judicial police France during inquests and operative units of Ukraine. Making a comparative analysis of powers in the field of operational subdivisions of Ukraine and governmental inquests France be traced a certain resemblance between them.  However, it is made a conclusion that the judicial police France has more rights during inquests, unlike the operative units of Ukraine. In addition, are considered and compares the powers of public prosecutor offices France and Ukraine. In addition, the powers of the prosecutor's office of France and Ukraine are reviewed and compared. It is concluded that the Office of the Prosecutor's Office of Ukraine is simultaneously entrusted with the authority to organize, supervise, conduct pre-trial investigation, as well as form and maintain a prosecution in court, which testifies to the inconsistency and incompatibility of the procedural powers of the prosecutor's office in Ukraine. In contrast to the French investigating magistrate, it is possible to point out that, unlike the Ukrainian investigator, he is an uninterested objective arbiter, whereas the investigator in Ukraine, has been charged to the party of charges and is characterized by an indictment of authority.

The main drawback of pre-trial investigation in Ukraine should be regarded as his accusatory line with a combination of incompatible functions investigator for investigating accusations and protection. Submitted a proposal on the necessity of creating an independent, impartial trial investigation of his belonging to the court, depriving the prosecutor's office of the procedural guidance for the pre-trial. investigation. Operational-search activity, which was inherited from the Soviet model of pre-trial investigation, should be eliminated with the further creation of a single police inquiry under the direction of the prosecutor's office.

Keywords: functional structure, pre-trial investigation of France, pre-trial investigation of Ukraine, Appointment of an investigator, directions of improvement of pre-trial investigation. 

Подати статтю